THU0702 Are MRI-detected erosions specific for RA? a large explorative cross-sectional study. (15th June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boeters, D; Nieuwenhuis, W; Steenbergen, H van; Landewé, R; Reijnierse, M; Mil, A van der Helm-van
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 76(2017)Supplement 2
• Page Start: 473
• Page End: 473
• Publication Date: 2017-06-15
• Subjects: Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.4026
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended in the diagnostic process of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as it can detect damage at an earlier time point than conventional radiographs. However, MRI-detected erosions as defined by EULAR and included in RAMRIS are also observed in symptom-free controls, especially at older age. It is unclear how RA-specific erosions on MRI can be distinguished from physiological erosions in symptom-free individuals. Therefore this study compared MRI-detected erosions between RA-patients and healthy controls, including evaluation of the effect of age. Objectives: To compare characteristics of MRI-detected erosions (total erosion score, location and severity of erosions and simultaneous presence of MRI-detected inflammation) in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints between RA-patients and healthy controls. Methods: 422 subjects (229 newly presenting patients with a clinical diagnosis of RA and fulfilling the 2010-criteria and 193 symptom-free controls) underwent contrast enhanced 1.5T MRI of unilateral MCP and MTP joints. The readers were blind to the clinical information. Total erosion score according to the RAMRIS method (hence a combination of number and severity), location and severity of erosions and simultaneous presence of MRI-detected inflammation (synovitis and/or bone marrow edema) were compared between groups, also in relation to age. Results: First total erosion scores were analyzed. Both in RA-patients and in controls this score was associated with age (p<0.001 in both groups). In addition, at all ages and on group level, RA-patients had 1.2 (95% CI 1.1–1.3) times higher erosion scores than controls. Despite this difference, total erosion scores could not differentiate RA-patients from controls on the individual level, as there was large overlap (Figure). Next different characteristics of erosions were explored within age groups (<40, 40–59, ≥60) to search for RA-specific features. With respect to location, erosions found in MTP5 were specific for RA (spec 90–98% for different age groups). Erosions found in MTP1 were specific for RA if subjects were aged <40 (spec 98%), but specificity decreased by increasing age (spec 86% if aged 40–59 and 63% if aged ≥60). Evaluating the severity revealed that "severe erosions" (scores ≥2) were infrequent in all subjects, but almost exclusively present in RA (spec 98–100%). Finally the simultaneous presence of erosions with inflammation was studied. In the age group <40 years, the simultaneous presence was exclusively observed in RA-patients (specificity 100%); but specificity decreased by age since the combined presence was also seen in symptom-free controls (spec 91% if aged 40–59 and 71% if aged ≥60 years). Conclusions: Whilst the group of RA-patients at disease presentation had significantly higher erosion-scores than healthy controls, scores of individual subjects were largely overlapping. Some erosion characteristics were specific for RA, but these were present in only a minority of all RA-patients (22%). Disclosure of Interest: None declared