Bowel function and quality of life after local excision or total mesorectal excision following chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Issue 1 (5th October 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Bowel function and quality of life after local excision or total mesorectal excision following chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Issue 1 (5th October 2016)
- Main Title:
- Bowel function and quality of life after local excision or total mesorectal excision following chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
- Authors:
- Pucciarelli, S.
Giandomenico, F.
De Paoli, A.
Gavaruzzi, T.
Lotto, L.
Mantello, G.
Barba, C.
Zotti, P.
Flora, S.
Del Bianco, P. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Local excision for rectal cancer is expected to offer a better functional outcome than conventional surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare quality of life and bowel function in patients with rectal cancer who underwent either local excision or conventional surgery after chemoradiotherapy. Methods: This was a retrospective multicentre study. Patients who underwent local excision were compared with those who had mesorectal excision. Quality of life and bowel function were investigated using validated questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ‐C30, EORTC QLQ‐CR29 and Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument) at a median follow‐up of 49 (range 13–95) months. Further analysis was undertaken of data from patients who underwent local excision alone compared with those requiring subsequent radical surgery. Statistical significance was set at P < 0·010. Results: The mean constipation score was significantly better in the local excision group than in the mesorectal excision group (3·8 (95 per cent c.i. 0·3 to 7·2) versus 19·8 (12·1 to 27·4); P < 0·001). Compared with patients who underwent mesorectal excision, those who had local excision had less sensation of incomplete emptying (mean score 3·7 (3·4 to 4·0) versus 2·8 (2·5 to 3·1); P < 0·001) and second bowel movements within 15 min (mean score 3·6 (3·3 to 3·9) versus 3·0 (2·7 to 3·3); P = 0·006). Patients who underwent localAbstract: Background: Local excision for rectal cancer is expected to offer a better functional outcome than conventional surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare quality of life and bowel function in patients with rectal cancer who underwent either local excision or conventional surgery after chemoradiotherapy. Methods: This was a retrospective multicentre study. Patients who underwent local excision were compared with those who had mesorectal excision. Quality of life and bowel function were investigated using validated questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ‐C30, EORTC QLQ‐CR29 and Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument) at a median follow‐up of 49 (range 13–95) months. Further analysis was undertaken of data from patients who underwent local excision alone compared with those requiring subsequent radical surgery. Statistical significance was set at P < 0·010. Results: The mean constipation score was significantly better in the local excision group than in the mesorectal excision group (3·8 (95 per cent c.i. 0·3 to 7·2) versus 19·8 (12·1 to 27·4); P < 0·001). Compared with patients who underwent mesorectal excision, those who had local excision had less sensation of incomplete emptying (mean score 3·7 (3·4 to 4·0) versus 2·8 (2·5 to 3·1); P < 0·001) and second bowel movements within 15 min (mean score 3·6 (3·3 to 3·9) versus 3·0 (2·7 to 3·3); P = 0·006). Patients who underwent local excision alone scored better than those who had mesorectal excision, particularly for bowel function, who, in turn, scored better than patients requiring subsequent radical surgery following local excision. Conclusion: Patients who underwent local excision had a better quality of life and bowel function than those who underwent mesorectal excision. Abstract : Less is more … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 104:Issue 1(2017)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 104:Issue 1(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 104, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 104
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0104-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 138
- Page End:
- 147
- Publication Date:
- 2016-10-05
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.10318 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17747.xml