'No' to lesbian motherhood using human nuclear genome transfer. Issue 12 (25th May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Baylis, Françoise
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical ethics. Volume 44:Issue 12(2018)
• Page Start: 865
• Page End: 867
• Publication Date: 2018-05-25
• Subjects: ethics -- reproductive medicine -- genetic engineering; Medical ethics -- Periodicals; 174.2
• DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104860
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-6800

Abstract

Abstract : Giulia Cavaliere and César Palacios-González argue that lesbian couples should have access to human nuclear genome transfer (so-called mitochondrial replacement) so that both members of the couple can have a genetic link to the child they intend to parent. Their argument is grounded in an appeal to reproductive freedom. In this Response, I address a number of concerns with their argument. These concerns relate to nomenclature, treating like cases alike, genetic-relatedness and the limits of reproductive rights. On this last point, I insist that we should not mistake 'wants' for 'needs' or 'rights'. I maintain that there is no right to biological parenthood, there is no compelling need for human nuclear genome transfer to satisfy a so-called need for genetically-related children, and we ought not to pander to an acquired desire (ie, want) for genetic filiation.