Impact and use of reviews and 'overviews of reviews' to inform clinical practice guideline recommendations: protocol for a methods study. Issue 1 (20th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lunny, Carole; Ramasubbu, Cynthia; Gerrish, Savannah; Liu, Tracy; Salzwedel, Douglas M; Puil, Lorri; Mintzes, Barbara; Wright, James (Jim)
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 10:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-01-20
• Subjects: methodology -- methods study -- meta-epidemiology -- clinical practice guidelines -- systematic reviews -- meta-analyses; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031442
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Guidelines are systematically developed recommendations to assist practitioner and patient decisions about treatments for clinical conditions. High quality and comprehensive systematic reviews and 'overviews of systematic reviews' (overviews) represent the best available evidence. Many guideline developers, such as the WHO and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, recommend the use of these research syntheses to underpin guideline recommendations. We aim to evaluate the impact and use of systematic reviews with and without pairwise meta-analysis or network meta-analyses (NMAs) and overviews in clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations. Methods and analysis: CPGs will be retrieved from Turning Research Into Practice and Epistemonikos (2017–2018). The retrieved citations will be sorted randomly and then screened sequentially by two independent reviewers until 50 CPGs have been identified. We will include CPGs that provide at least two explicit recommendations for the management of any clinical condition. We will assess whether reviews or overviews were cited in a recommendation as part of the development process for guidelines. Data extraction will be done independently by two authors and compared. We will assess the risk of bias by examining how each guideline developed clinical recommendations. We will calculate the number and frequency of citations of reviews with or without pairwise meta-analysis, reviews with NMAs and overviews, and whether they were systematically or non-systematically developed. Results will be described, tabulated and categorised based on review type (reviews or overviews). CPGs reporting the use of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be compared with those using a different system, and pharmacological versus non-pharmacological CPGs will be compared. Ethics and dissemination: No ethics approval is required. We will present at the Cochrane Colloquium and the Guidelines International Network conference.