How to identify which patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis could benefit from endarterectomy or stenting. Issue 2 (24th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Paraskevas, Kosmas I; Veith, Frank J; Spence, J David
• Is Part Of: Stroke and vascular neurology. Volume 3:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 92
• Page End: 100
• Publication Date: 2018-02-24
• Subjects: asymptomatic carotid stenosis -- stroke risk -- carotid endarterectomy -- best medical therapy -- identification of high risk subgroups; Cerebrovascular disease -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.81005
• DOI: 10.1136/svn-2017-000129
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2059-8688

Abstract

Abstract : Offering routine carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) to patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACS) is no longer considered as the optimal management of these patients. Equally suboptimal, however, is the policy of offering only best medical treatment (BMT) to all patients with ACS and not considering any of them for prophylactic CEA. In the last few years, there have been many studies aiming to identify reliable predictors of future cerebrovascular events that would allow the identification of patients with high-risk ACS and offer a prophylactic carotid intervention only to these patients to prevent them from becoming symptomatic. All patients with ACS should receive BMT. The present article will summarise the evidence suggesting ways to identify these high-risk asymptomatic individuals, namely: (1) microemboli detection on transcranial Doppler, (2) plaque echolucency on Duplex ultrasound, (3) progression in the severity of ACS, (4) silent embolic infarcts on brain CT/MRI, (5) reduced cerebrovascular reserve, (6) increased size of juxtaluminal hypoechoic area, (7) identification of intraplaque haemorrhage using MRI and (8) carotid ulceration. The evidence suggests that approximately 10%–15% of patents with asymptomatic stenosis might benefit from intervention; this will become more clear after publication of ongoing studies comparing stenting or endarterectomy with best medical therapy. In the meantime, no patient should be offered intervention unless there is evidence of high risk of ipsilateral stroke, from modalities such as those discussed here.