Outcome of very preterm birth: children reviewed with ease at 2 years differ from those followed up with difficulty. Issue 2 (1st September 1998)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tin, Win; Fritz, Susan; Wariyar, Unni; Hey, Edmund
• Is Part Of: Archives of disease in childhood. Volume 79:Issue 2(1998)
• Page Start: F83
• Page End: F87
• Publication Date: 1998-09-01
• Subjects: disability -- preterm -- prevalence studies; Infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Newborn infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Fetus -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 618.920105
• DOI: 10.1136/fn.79.2.F83
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1359-2998

Abstract

Abstract : AIM: To determine whether those most easily reviewed in a population prevalence study differ from those followed up only with difficulty. METHODS: All babies born before 32 weeks of gestation in the North of England in 1983, 1990, and 1991 were traced, and all the survivors assessed at two years by one of two independent clinicians. RESULTS: 818 of the 1138 live born babies survived to discharge. There was some non-significant, excess disability in the 5% of long term survivors who were difficult to trace because of social mobility, but eight times as much severe disability in the 1% (9/796) in care and in the 5% (38/796) whose parents initially failed to keep a series of home or hospital appointments for interview, and five times as much emergent disability in the 2.7% (22/818) who died after discharge but before their second birthday. Had the babies who were seen without difficulty been considered representative of all the babies surviving to discharge, the reported disability rate would have been two thirds what it really was (6.9% instead of 11.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Population prevalence studies that ignore those who seem reluctant to cooperate risk serious ascertainment bias.