Choroidal thickness maps from spectral domain and swept source optical coherence tomography: algorithmic versus ground truth annotation. Issue 10 (14th January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Philip, Ana-Maria; Gerendas, Bianca S; Zhang, Li; Faatz, Henrik; Podkowinski, Dominika; Bogunovic, Hrvoje; Abramoff, Michael D; Hagmann, Michael; Leitner, Roland; Simader, Christian; Sonka, Milan; Waldstein, Sebastian M; Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula
• Is Part Of: British journal of ophthalmology. Volume 100:Issue 10(2016)
• Page Start: 1372
• Page End: 1376
• Publication Date: 2016-01-14
• Subjects: Choroid -- Imaging; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; 617.7
• DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307985
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1161

Abstract

Abstract : Background/aims: The purpose of the study was to create a standardised protocol for choroidal thickness measurements and to determine whether choroidal thickness measurements made on images obtained by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source (SS-) OCT from patients with healthy retina are interchangeable when performed manually or with an automatic algorithm. Methods: 36 grid cell measurements for choroidal thickness for each volumetric scan were obtained, which were measured for SD-OCT and SS-OCT with two methods on 18 eyes of healthy volunteers. Manual segmentation by experienced retinal graders from the Vienna Reading Center and automated segmentation on >6300 images of the choroid from both devices were statistically compared. Results: Model-based comparison between SD-OCT/SS-OCT showed a systematic difference in choroidal thickness of 16.26±0.725 μm (p<0.001) for manual segmentation and 21.55±0.725 μm (p<0.001) for automated segmentation. Comparison of automated with manual segmentations revealed small differences in thickness of −0.68±0.513 μm (p=0.1833). The correlation coefficients for SD-OCT and SS-OCT measures within eyes were 0.975 for manual segmentation and 0.955 for automatic segmentation. Conclusion: Choroidal thickness measurements of SD-OCT and SS-OCT indicate that these two devices are interchangeable with a trend of choroidal thickness measurements being slightly thicker on SD-OCT with limited clinical relevance. Use of an automated algorithm to segment choroidal thickness was validated in healthy volunteers.