Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study. Issue 3 (1st March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nurjono, Milawaty; Shrestha, Pami; Lee, Alice; Lim, Xin Ya; Shiraz, Farah; Tan, Shermin; Wong, Shing Hei; Foo, Kah Mun; Wee, Thomas; Toh, Sue-Anne; Yoong, Joanne; Maria Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 8:Issue 3(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-03-01
• Subjects: Realist Evaluation -- Integrated Care -- Mixed Methods Evaluation; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017111
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: The lack of understanding of how complex integrated care programmes achieve their outcomes due to the lack of acceptable methods leads to difficulties in the development, implementation, adaptation and scaling up of similar interventions. In this study, we evaluate an integrated care network, the National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS), consisting of acute hospitals, step down care, primary care providers, social services and community partners using a theory-driven realist evaluation approach. This study aims to examine how and for whom the NUHS-RHS works to improve healthcare utilisations, outcomes, care experiences and reduce healthcare costs. By using a realist approach that balances the needs of context-specific evaluation with international comparability, this study carries the potential to address current research gaps. Methods and analysis: This evaluation will be conducted in three research phases: (1) development of initial programme theory (IPT) underlying the NUHS-RHS; (2) testing of programme theory using empirical data; and (3) refinement of IPT. IPT was elicited and developed through reviews of programme documents, informal discussions and in-depth interviews with relevant stakeholders. Then, a convergent parallel mixed method study will be conducted to assess context (C), mechanisms (M) and outcomes (O) to test the IPT. Findings will then be analysed according to the realist evaluation formula of CMO in which findings on the context, mechanisms will be used to explain the outcomes. Finally, based on findings gathered, IPT will be refined to highlight how to improve the NUHS-RHS by detailing what works (outcome), as well as how (mechanisms) and under what conditions (context). Ethics and dissemination: The National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Domain Specific Review Board reviewed and approved this study protocol. Study results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and internally to NUHS-RHS and Ministry of Health, Singapore.