Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance specialist access to care: a scoping review protocol. Issue 9 (28th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Osman, Mohamed A; Schick-Makaroff, Kara; Thompson, Stephanie; Featherstone, Robin; Bialy, Liza; Kurzawa, Julia; Okpechi, Ikechi G; Habib, Syed; Shojai, Soroush; Jindal, Kailash; Klarenbach, Scott; Bello, Aminu K
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 8:Issue 9(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-09-28
• Subjects: epidemiology -- health policy -- quality in health care -- organisation of health services; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022733
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Electronic consultations (eConsult), asynchronous exchanges of patient health information at a distance, are increasingly used as an option to facilitate patient care and collaboration between primary care providers and specialists. Although eConsult has demonstrated success in increasing efficiency in the referral process and enhancing access to care, little is known about the factors influencing its wider adoption and implementation by end users. In this paper, we describe a protocol to conduct a scoping review of the literature on the barriers and facilitators to a wider adoption and implementation of eConsult service. Methods and analysis: This scoping review will be based on the framework pioneered by Arksey and O'Malley and later developed by Levac et al . We will use the guidance for scoping reviews developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute to report our findings. In addition to several electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EBSCOhost and PsycINFO) studies will be identified by including relevant grey literature. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and full texts for inclusion. Studies reporting on barriers and/or facilitators in settings similar to eConsult will be included. Data on study characteristics and key barriers and facilitators will be extracted. Data will be analysed thematically and classified using the Quadruple Aim framework. Ethics and dissemination: Approval by research ethics board is not required since the review will only include published and publicly accessible data. Review findings will be used to inform future studies and the development of practice tools to support the wider adoption and success of eConsult implementation. We plan to publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and develop a useful and accessible summary of the results.