Cost-effectiveness modelling of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from a cohort simulation conducted alongside the Healthlines randomised controlled trial. Issue 9 (26th September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dixon, Padraig; Hollinghurst, Sandra; Ara, Roberta; Edwards, Louisa; Foster, Alexis; Salisbury, Chris
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 6:Issue 9(2016)
• Publication Date: 2016-09-26
• Subjects: HEALTH ECONOMICS -- STROKE MEDICINE -- Angina; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012355
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To investigate the long-term cost-effectiveness (measured as the ratio of incremental NHS cost to incremental quality-adjusted life years) of a telehealth intervention for patients with raised cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Design: A cohort simulation model developed as part of the economic evaluation conducted alongside the Healthlines randomised controlled trial. Setting: Patients recruited through primary care, and intervention delivered via telehealth service. Participants: Participants with a 10-year CVD risk ≥20%, as measured by the QRISK2 algorithm, and with at least 1 modifiable risk factor, individually randomised from 42 general practices in England. Intervention: A telehealth service delivered over a 12-month period. The intervention involved a series of responsive, theory-led encounters between patients and trained health information advisors who provided access to information resources and supported medication adherence and coordination of care. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Cost-effectiveness measured by net monetary benefit over the simulated lifetime of trial participants from a UK National Health Service perspective. Results: The probability that the intervention was cost-effective depended on the duration of the effect of the intervention. The intervention was cost-effective with high probability if effects persisted over the lifetime of intervention recipients. The probability of cost-effectiveness was lower for shorter durations of effect. Conclusions: The intervention was likely to be cost-effective under a lifetime perspective. Trial registration number: ISRCTN27508731; Results.