Exposure and response analysis of aleglitazar on cardiovascular risk markers and safety outcomes: An analysis of the AleCardio trial. Issue 1 (1st October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Koomen, Jeroen V.; Heerspink, Hiddo J. L.; Schrieks, Ilse C.; Schwartz, Gregory G.; Lincoff, A. Michael; Nicholls, Stephen J.; Svensson, Anders; Wedel, Hans; Weichert, Arlette; Grobbee, Diederick E.; Stevens, Jasper
• Is Part Of: Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. Volume 22:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 30
• Page End: 38
• Publication Date: 2019-10-01
• Subjects: aleglitazar -- exposure response -- peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor -- PK‐PD -- randomized controlled trial; Diabetes -- Periodicals; Obesity -- Periodicals; Metabolism -- Disorders -- Periodicals; Clinical pharmacology -- Periodicals; 616.462
• DOI: 10.1111/dom.13862
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-8902

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: The AleCardio trial aimed to characterize the efficacy and safety of peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐αγ agonist aleglitazar in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome. The trial terminated early because of futility and safety signals. We evaluated whether the safety signals could be attributed to increased exposure to aleglitazar. Materials and Methods: The AleCardio trial enrolled 7226 patients to receive aleglitazar 150 μg or matching placebo on top of standard care. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted in a pharmacokinetic substudy to identify covariates that explained interindividual variability in exposure. Subsequently, the effect of these covariates on surrogate and clinical outcomes was assessed in the full patient population. Results: Concomitant administration of clopidogrel was identified as a covariate that influenced the apparent clearance of aleglitazar. Patients using clopidogrel had a mean predicted area under the plasma‐concentration‐time curve (AUC0–24 ) of 174.7 ng h/mL (SD: ±112.9 ng h/mL) versus 142.2 ng h/mL (SD: ±92.6 ng h/mL) in patients without clopidogrel. The effect of aleglitazar compared with placebo on HbA1c, haemoglobin, serum creatinine and adiponectin was modified by concomitant clopidogrel use ( P for interaction 0.007, 0.002, <0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Concomitant use of clopidogrel was identified as a covariate that explained interindividual variability in exposure to aleglitazar. Patients using clopidogrel showed an additional lowering of HbA1c, at the expense of an additional decrease in haemoglobin, and an increase in serum creatinine and adiponectin. Clopidogrel is a moderate inhibitor of CYP2C8. Because aleglitazar is metabolized by CYP2C8, a pharmacokinetic interaction could explain differences in exposure and response to aleglitazar.