Missing Evidence of Widespread Subglacial Lakes at Recovery Glacier, Antarctica. Issue 11 (7th November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Humbert, Angelika; Steinhage, Daniel; Helm, Veit; Beyer, Sebastian; Kleiner, Thomas
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 123:Issue 11(2018)
• Page Start: 2802
• Page End: 2826
• Publication Date: 2018-11-07
• Subjects: ice stream dynamics -- subglacial hydrology -- ice modeling -- radio‐echo sounding -- altimetry; Geomorphology -- Periodicals; 551.3
• DOI: 10.1029/2017JF004591
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9003

Abstract

Abstract : Recovery Glacier reaches far into the East Antarctic Ice Sheet. Recent projections point out that its dynamic behavior has a considerable impact on future Antarctic ice loss (Golledge et al., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072422 ). Subglacial lakes are thought to play a major role in the initiation of the rapid ice flow (Bell et al., 2007, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05554 ). Satellite altimetry observations have even suggested several actively filling and draining subglacial lakes beneath the main trunk (B. E. Smith et al., 2009, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309789470879 ). We present new data of the geometry of this glacier and investigate its basal properties employing radio‐echo sounding. Using ice sheet modeling, we were able to constrain estimates of radar absorption in the ice, but uncertainties remain large. The magnitude of the basal reflection coefficient is thus still poorly known. However, its spatial variability, in conjunction with additional indicators, can be used to infer the presence of subglacial water. We find no clear evidence of water at most of the previously proposed lake sites. Especially, locations, where altimetry detected active lakes, do not exhibit lake characteristics in radio‐echo sounding. We argue that lakes far upstream the main trunk are not triggering enhanced ice flow, which is also supported by modeled subglacial hydrology. Key Points: We find no clear evidence of water at most of the previously proposed lake sites Locations, where altimetry detected active lakes, do not exhibit lake characteristics in RES Lakes far upstream the main trunk are not triggering enhanced ice flow