Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of a Comprehensive geriatric assessment and management for Canadian elders with Cancer—the 5C study: a study protocol for a randomised controlled phase III trial. Issue 5 (10th May 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of a Comprehensive geriatric assessment and management for Canadian elders with Cancer—the 5C study: a study protocol for a randomised controlled phase III trial. Issue 5 (10th May 2019)
- Main Title:
- Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of a Comprehensive geriatric assessment and management for Canadian elders with Cancer—the 5C study: a study protocol for a randomised controlled phase III trial
- Authors:
- Puts, Martine T E
Hsu, Tina
Mariano, Caroline
Monette, Johanne
Brennenstuhl, Sarah
Pitters, Eric
Ray, Jack
Wan-Chow-Wah, Doreen
Kozlowski, Natascha
Krzyzanowska, Monika
Amir, Eitan
Elser, Christine
Jang, Raymond
Prica, Anca
Krahn, Murray
Beland, Francois
Bergman, Simon
Koneru, Rama
Lemonde, Manon
Szumacher, Ewa
Zidulka, Joan
Fung, Shek
Li, Anson
Emmenegger, Urban
Mehta, Rajin
Flemming, Kendra
Breunis, Henriette
Alibhai, Shabbir M H - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Geriatric assessment and management is recommended for older adults with cancer referred for chemotherapy but no randomised controlled trial has been completed of this intervention in the oncology setting. Trial design: A two-group parallel single blind multi-centre randomised trial with a companion trial-based economic evaluation from both payer and societal perspectives with process evaluation. Participants: A total of 350 participants aged 70+, diagnosed with a solid tumour, lymphoma or myeloma, referred for first/second line chemotherapy, who speak English/French, have an Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group Performance Status 0–2 will be recruited. All participants will be followed for 12 months. Intervention: Geriatric assessment and management for 6 months. The control group will receive usual oncologic care. All participants will receive a monthly healthy ageing booklet for 6 months. Objective: To study the clinical and cost-effectiveness of geriatric assessment and management in optimising outcomes compared with usual oncology care. Randomisation: Participants will be allocated to one of the two arms in a 1:1 ratio. The randomisation will be stratified by centre and treatment intent (palliative vs other). Outcome: Quality of life. Secondary outcomes: (1) Cost-effectiveness, (2) functional status, (3) number of geriatric issues successfully addressed, (4) grades3–5 treatment toxicity, (5) healthcare use, (6) satisfaction, (7) cancer treatmentAbstract : Introduction: Geriatric assessment and management is recommended for older adults with cancer referred for chemotherapy but no randomised controlled trial has been completed of this intervention in the oncology setting. Trial design: A two-group parallel single blind multi-centre randomised trial with a companion trial-based economic evaluation from both payer and societal perspectives with process evaluation. Participants: A total of 350 participants aged 70+, diagnosed with a solid tumour, lymphoma or myeloma, referred for first/second line chemotherapy, who speak English/French, have an Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group Performance Status 0–2 will be recruited. All participants will be followed for 12 months. Intervention: Geriatric assessment and management for 6 months. The control group will receive usual oncologic care. All participants will receive a monthly healthy ageing booklet for 6 months. Objective: To study the clinical and cost-effectiveness of geriatric assessment and management in optimising outcomes compared with usual oncology care. Randomisation: Participants will be allocated to one of the two arms in a 1:1 ratio. The randomisation will be stratified by centre and treatment intent (palliative vs other). Outcome: Quality of life. Secondary outcomes: (1) Cost-effectiveness, (2) functional status, (3) number of geriatric issues successfully addressed, (4) grades3–5 treatment toxicity, (5) healthcare use, (6) satisfaction, (7) cancer treatment plan modification and (8) overall survival. Planned analysis: For the primary outcome we will use a pattern mixture model using an intent-to-treat approach (at 3, 6 and12 months). We will conduct a cost-utility analysis alongside this clinical trial. For secondary outcomes 2–4, we will use a variety of methods. Ethics and dissemination: Our study has been approved by all required REBs. We will disseminate our findings to stakeholders locally, nationally and internationally and by publishing the findings. Trial registration number: NCT03154671 . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 5(2019)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0009-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-05-10
- Subjects:
- randomized controlled trial -- geriatric oncology -- comprehensive geriatric assessment -- frail elderly -- cost-effectiveness analyses
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024485 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17667.xml