Comparing targeted thrust manipulation with general thrust manipulation in patients with low back pain. A general approach is as effective as a specific one. A randomised controlled trial. Issue 1 (5th October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparing targeted thrust manipulation with general thrust manipulation in patients with low back pain. A general approach is as effective as a specific one. A randomised controlled trial. Issue 1 (5th October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Comparing targeted thrust manipulation with general thrust manipulation in patients with low back pain. A general approach is as effective as a specific one. A randomised controlled trial
- Authors:
- McCarthy, Christopher J
Potter, Louise
Oldham, Jackie A - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Spinal manipulation is commonly used to treat back pain. The application of spinal manipulation has traditionally involved an element of targeting the technique to a level of the spine where the proposed movement dysfunction is sited. We evaluated the effects of a targeted manipulative thrust versus a thrust applied generally to the lumbar region. Methods: A randomised controlled clinical trial in patients with low back pain following CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) guidelines. Sixty subjects were randomly allocated to two groups: one group received a targeted manipulative thrust (n=29) and the other a general manipulation thrust (GT) (n=31) to the lumbar spine. Thrust was either localised to a clinician-defined symptomatic spinal level or an equal force was applied through the whole lumbosacral region. We measured pressure-pain thresholds (PPTs) using algometry and muscle activity (magnitude of stretch reflex) via surface electromyography. Numerical ratings of pain and Oswestry Disability Index scores were collected. Results: Repeated measures of analysis of covariance revealed no between-group differences in self-reported pain or PPT for any of the muscles studied. Summary: A GT procedure—applied without any specific targeting—was as effective in reducing participants' pain scores as targeted approaches. Trial registration number: ISRCTN11994230 .
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open sport & exercise medicine. Volume 5:Issue 1(2019)
- Journal:
- BMJ open sport & exercise medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 5:Issue 1(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 5, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0005-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10-05
- Subjects:
- back injuries -- physiotherapy -- sports physiotherapy
Sports medicine -- Periodicals
Exercise therapy -- Periodicals
617.102705 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopensem.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000514 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2055-7647
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17649.xml