Step-downs reduce workers' compensation payments to encourage return to work: are they effective?. (27th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lane, Tyler J; Sheehan, Luke; Gray, Shannon E; Beck, Dianne; Collie, Alex
• Is Part Of: Occupational and environmental medicine. Volume 77:Number 7(2020)
• Page Start: 470
• Page End: 477
• Publication Date: 2020-03-27
• Subjects: regression discontinuity -- workers' compensation -- return to work; Medicine, Industrial -- Periodicals; Environmental health -- Periodicals; 616.980305
• DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106325
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1351-0711

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To determine whether step-downs, which cut the rate of compensation paid to injured workers after they have been on benefits for several months, are effective as a return to work incentive. Methods: We aggregated administrative claims data from seven Australian workers' compensation systems to calculate weekly scheme exit rates, a proxy for return to work. Jurisdictions were further subdivided into four injury subgroups: fractures, musculoskeletal, mental health and other trauma. The effect of step-downs on scheme exit was tested using a regression discontinuity design. Results were pooled into meta-analyses to calculate combined effects and the proportion of variance attributable to heterogeneity. Results: The combined effect of step-downs was a 0.86 percentage point (95% CI −1.45 to −0.27) reduction in the exit rate, with significant heterogeneity between jurisdictions ( I 2 =68%, p=0.003). Neither timing nor magnitude of step-downs was a significant moderator of effects. Within injury subgroups, only fractures had a significant combined effect (−0.84, 95% CI −1.61 to −0.07). Sensitivity analysis indicated potential effects within mental health and musculoskeletal conditions as well. Conclusions: The results suggest some workers' compensation recipients anticipate step-downs and exit the system early to avoid the reduction in income. However, the effects were small and suggest step-downs have marginal practical significance. We conclude that step-downs are generally ineffective as a return to work policy initiative. Postprint link: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/19012286