Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating feasibility and acceptability of cognitive remediation group therapy compared with mutual aid group therapy for people ageing with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) in Toronto, Canada. Issue 10 (31st October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Eaton, Andrew David; Walmsley, Sharon L; Craig, Shelley L; Rourke, Sean B; Sota, Teresa; McCullagh, John W; Fallon, Barbara A
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 10(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-10-31
• Subjects: HIV & AIDS -- dementia -- social medicine -- clinical trials; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033183
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) may affect 30%–50% of people ageing with HIV. HAND may increase stress and anxiety, and impede coping. Psychosocial group therapy may ameliorate HAND's symptoms, yet the ideal intervention is unclear. This protocol outlines a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT)—designed using community-based participatory research—to pilot cognitive remediation group therapy (CRGT) against an active comparator. Methods and analysis: This is a pilot, parallel design, two-arm RCT that will recruit participants diagnosed with the mild neurocognitive disorder form of HAND from a neurobehavioural research unit at a tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Canada. Eligibility criteria include age ≥40 years, known HIV status for 5+ years, English fluency, able to consent and able to attend 8 weeks of group therapy. Eligible participants will be randomised to one of two treatment arms, each consisting of eight-session group interventions delivered once weekly at 3 hours per session. Arm 1 (novel) is CRGT, combining mindfulness-based stress reduction with brain training activities. Arm 2 (active control) is mutual aid group therapy. The primary outcomes are feasibility, measured by proportions of recruitment and completion, and acceptability, determined by a satisfaction questionnaire. The secondary outcome is intervention fidelity, where content analysis will be used to assess facilitator session reports. A between-group analysis will be conducted on exploratory outcomes of stress, anxiety, coping and use of intervention activities that will be collected at three time points. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Boards of St. Michael's Hospital and the University of Toronto. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and community reporting. This study could provide insight into design (eg, recruitment, measures) and intervention considerations (eg, structure, content) for a larger trial to lessen the burden of cognitive decline among people ageing with HIV. Trial registration number: NCT03483740; Pre-results