Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Issue 11 (6th November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Issue 11 (6th November 2019)
- Main Title:
- Phase II randomised control feasibility trial of a nutrition and physical activity intervention after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
- Authors:
- Hackshaw-McGeagh, Lucy E
Penfold, Chris
Shingler, Ellie
Robles, Luke A
Perks, Claire M
Holly, Jeff M P
Rowe, Edward
Koupparis, Anthony
Bahl, Amit
Persad, Raj
Shiridzinomwa, Constance
Johnson, Lyndsey
Biernacka, Kalina M
Frankow, Aleksandra
Woodside, Jayne V
Gilchrist, Sarah
Oxley, Jon
Abrams, Paul
Lane, J Athene
Martin, Richard M - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: Dietary factors and physical activity may alter prostate cancer progression. We explored the feasibility of lifestyle interventions following radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer. Design: Patients were recruited into a presurgical observational cohort; following radical prostatectomy, they were offered randomisation into a 2×3 factorial randomised controlled trial (RCT). Setting: A single National Health Service trust in the South West of England, UK. Participants: Those with localised prostate cancer and listed for radical prostatectomy were invited to participate. Randomisation: Random allocation was performed by the Bristol Randomised Trial Collaboration via an online system. Interventions: Men were randomised into both a modified nutrition group (either increased vegetable and fruit, and reduced dairy milk; or lycopene supplementation; or control) and a physical activity group (brisk walking or control) for 6 months. Blinding: Only the trial statistician was blind to allocations. Primary outcome measures: Primary outcomes were measures of feasibility: randomisation rates and intervention adherence at 6 months. Collected at trial baseline, three and six months, with daily adherence reported throughout. Our intended adherence rate was 75% or above, the threshold for acceptable adherence was 90%. Results: 108 men entered the presurgical cohort, and 81 were randomised into the postsurgical RCT (randomisation rate: 93.1%) and 75 completedAbstract : Objective: Dietary factors and physical activity may alter prostate cancer progression. We explored the feasibility of lifestyle interventions following radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer. Design: Patients were recruited into a presurgical observational cohort; following radical prostatectomy, they were offered randomisation into a 2×3 factorial randomised controlled trial (RCT). Setting: A single National Health Service trust in the South West of England, UK. Participants: Those with localised prostate cancer and listed for radical prostatectomy were invited to participate. Randomisation: Random allocation was performed by the Bristol Randomised Trial Collaboration via an online system. Interventions: Men were randomised into both a modified nutrition group (either increased vegetable and fruit, and reduced dairy milk; or lycopene supplementation; or control) and a physical activity group (brisk walking or control) for 6 months. Blinding: Only the trial statistician was blind to allocations. Primary outcome measures: Primary outcomes were measures of feasibility: randomisation rates and intervention adherence at 6 months. Collected at trial baseline, three and six months, with daily adherence reported throughout. Our intended adherence rate was 75% or above, the threshold for acceptable adherence was 90%. Results: 108 men entered the presurgical cohort, and 81 were randomised into the postsurgical RCT (randomisation rate: 93.1%) and 75 completed the trial. Of 25 men in the nutrition intervention, 10 (40.0%; 95% CI 23.4% to 59.3%) adhered to the fruit and vegetable recommendations and 18 (72.0%; 95% CI 52.4% to 85.7%) to reduced dairy intake. Adherence to lycopene (n=28), was 78.6% (95% CI 60.5% to 89.8%), while 21/39 adhered to the walking intervention (53.8%; 95% CI 38.6% to 68.4%). Most men were followed up at 6 months (75/81; 92.6%). Three 'possibly related' adverse events were indigestion, abdominal bloating and knee pain. Conclusions: Interventions were deemed feasible, with high randomisation rates and generally good adherence. A definitive RCT is proposed. Trial registration number: ISRCTN 99048944. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 11(2019)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 11(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 11 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0009-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11-06
- Subjects:
- prostate disease -- urology -- clinical trials -- surgery -- preventive medicine -- urological tumours
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029480 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17634.xml