Intramedullary nails versus distal locking plates for fracture of the distal femur: results from the Trial of Acute Femoral Fracture Fixation (TrAFFix) randomised feasibility study and process evaluation. Issue 5 (5th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Griffin, Xavier L; Costa, Matthew L; Phelps, Emma; Parsons, Nicholas; Dritsaki, Melina; Achten, Juul; Tutton, Elizabeth; Lerner, Robin Gillmore; McGibbon, Alwin; Baird, Janis
• Other Names: author non-byline.; Noyes David author non-byline.; Giannoudis Peter author non-byline.; Ollivere Ben author non-byline.; Lewis Charlotte author non-byline.; McAndrew Andrew author non-byline.; Majeed Haroon author non-byline.; Mcclelland Damian author non-byline.; Kulkarni Ashwin author non-byline.
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 5(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-05-05
• Subjects: clinical trials -- fractures, bone -- fracture fixation, internal -- randomized controlled trial -- feasibility studies -- femoral fractures; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026810
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: This feasibility study and process evaluation assessed the likely success of a definitive trial of intramedullary fixation with locked retrograde nails versus extramedullary fixation with fixed angle plates for fractures of the distal femur. Design & setting: A multicentre, parallel, two-arm, randomised controlled feasibility study with an embedded process evaluation was conducted at seven NHS hospitals in England. Treatment was randomly allocated in 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre and chronic cognitive impairment. Participants, but not surgeons or research staff, were blinded to the allocation. Participants: Patients 18 years and older with a fracture of the distal femur, who their surgeon believed would benefit from internal fixation, were eligible to take part.Participants were allocated to receive either a retrograde intramedullary nail or an anatomical locking plate. Outcomes: The primary outcomes for this feasibility study were the recruitment rate and completion rate of the EQ-5D-5L at 4 months post-randomisation. Baseline characteristics, disability rating index, quality of life scores, measurements of social support and self-efficacy, resource use and radiographic assessments were also collected. The views of patients and staff were collected during interviews. Results: Recruitment and data completion were lower than expected. 23 of 82 eligible patients were recruited (nail, 11; plate, 12). The recruitment rate was estimated as 0.42 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.62) participants per centre-month. Data completeness of the EQ-5D-5L at 4 months was 61 per cent (95% CI 43% to 83%). The process evaluation demonstrated that the main barriers to recruitment were variation in treatment pathways across centres, lack of surgeon equipoise and confidence in using both interventions and newly formed research cultures that lacked cohesion. Conclusions: A modified trial design, with embedded recruitment support intervention, comparing functional outcome in cognitively intact adults who have sustained a fragility fracture of the distal femur is feasible. Ethics approval: The Wales Research Ethics Committee 5 approved the study (ref: 16/WA/0225). Trial registration number: ISRCTN92089567 ; Pre-results.