The Role of transanal (Ta) dissection in the management of difficult primary and recurrent rectal cancer. Issue 1 (21st June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Courval, Valérie; Drolet, Sébastien; Bouchard, Alexandre; Bouchard, Philippe
• Is Part Of: BMJ open gastroenterology. Volume 6:Issue 1(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-06-21
• Subjects: surgical oncology -- laparoscopic surgery -- colorectal cancer; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33005
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000305
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2054-4774

Abstract

Abstract : Background: The objective of this study was to review the postoperative and short-term oncological outcomes of our first cohort of patients having had a transanal (Ta) approach for primary or recurrent rectal cancer. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all cases of Ta dissection occurring between 2013 and 2016. We reviewed data concerning case selection, tumour characteristics, perioperative and postoperative data and final pathology. Results: A total of 24 males were operated for primary (92% (22/24)) or recurrent rectal cancer (8.3% (2/24)). Four patients (16.7% (4/24)) had a history of previous rectal surgery and two had a history of previous Ta total mesorectal excision (TME). A majority of patients were obese, with 58.3% (14/24) having a body mass index >30. The laparoscopic approach was used in the majority of cases (95.8% (23/24)). Most patients had a low anterior resection (95.8% (23/24)). Sixteen patients received a temporary ileostomy (66.7% (16/24)). Three patients suffered perioperative complications (including colonic ischaemia, rectal perforation and arterial bleeding). Five patients (21.7% (5/23)) had an anastomotic leak treated with Ta drainage in two patients. Final pathology revealed negative margins in 95.8% (23/24). TME was considered complete in 87.5% (21/24) overall and in 95% (21/22) when considering only primary cancer cases. Conclusion: According to our cohort of selected difficult cases, Ta dissection approach helped achieve complete mesorectal excision in complex primary rectal cancer but also allowed for rectal resection in patients with previous rectal surgery. This technique also helped perform a primary anastomosis in these difficult cases.