European Stroke Organisation and European Academy of Neurology joint guidelines on post-stroke cognitive impairment. (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Quinn, Terence J; Richard, Edo; Teuschl, Yvonne; Gattringer, Thomas; Hafdi, Melanie; O'Brien, John T; Merriman, Niamh; Gillebert, Celine; Huyglier, Hanne; Verdelho, Ana; Schmidt, Reinhold; Ghaziani, Emma; Forchammer, Hysse; Pendlebury, Sarah T; Bruffaerts, Rose; Mijajlovic, Milija; Drozdowska, Bogna A; Ball, Emily; Markus, Hugh S
• Is Part Of: European stroke journal. Volume 6:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: I
• Page End: XXXVIII
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: Cognition -- dementia -- diagnosis -- guidelines -- stroke -- prognosis; Cerebrovascular disease -- Periodicals; 616.8005
• DOI: 10.1177/23969873211042192
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2396-9873

Abstract

The optimal management of post-stroke cognitive impairment remains controversial. These joint European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Academy of Neurology (EAN) guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians in decision making around prevention, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. These guidelines were developed according to ESO standard operating procedure and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The working group identified relevant clinical questions, performed systematic reviews and, where possible, meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence and made specific recommendations. Expert consensus statements were provided where insufficient evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach. There was limited randomised controlled trial evidence regarding single or multicomponent interventions to prevent post-stroke cognitive decline. Interventions to improve lifestyle and treat vascular risk factors may have many health benefits but a beneficial effect on cognition is not proven. We found no evidence around routine cognitive screening following stroke but recognise the importance of targeted cognitive assessment. We described the accuracy of various cognitive screening tests but found no clearly superior approach to testing. There was insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for use of cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine nootropics or cognitive rehabilitation. There was limited evidence on the use of prediction tools for post-stroke cognitive syndromes (cognitive impairment, dementia and delirium). The association between post-stroke cognitive impairment and most acute structural brain imaging features was unclear, although the presence of substantial white matter hyperintensities of presumed vascular origin on acute MRI brain may help predict cognitive outcomes. These guidelines have highlighted fundamental areas where robust evidence is lacking. Further, definitive randomised controlled trials are needed, and we suggest priority areas for future research.