Association between high cost user status and end-of-life care in hospitalized patients: A national cohort study of patients who die in hospital. (October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Quinn, Kieran L; Hsu, Amy T; Meaney, Christopher; Qureshi, Danial; Tanuseputro, Peter; Seow, Hsien; Webber, Colleen; Fowler, Rob; Downar, James; Goldman, Russell; Chan, Raphael; McGrail, Kimberlyn; Isenberg, Sarina R
• Other Names: Morin Lucas guest-editor.; Onwuteaka-Philipsen Bregje guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: Palliative medicine. Volume 35:Number 9(2021)
• Page Start: 1671
• Page End: 1681
• Publication Date: 2021-10
• Subjects: High cost users -- delivery of healthcare -- end-of-life -- palliative care; Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Palliative treatment -- Periodicals; Palliative Care -- Periodicals; Palliatieve behandeling; 616.029
• DOI: 10.1177/02692163211002045
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-2163

Abstract

Background: Studies comparing end-of-life care between patients who are high cost users of the healthcare system compared to those who are not are lacking. Aim: The objective of this study was to describe and measure the association between high cost user status and several health services outcomes for all adults in Canada who died in acute care, compared to non-high cost users and those without prior healthcare use. Settings and participants: We used administrative data for all adults who died in hospital in Canada between 2011 and 2015 to measure the odds of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), receipt of invasive interventions, major surgery, and receipt of palliative care during the hospitalization in which the patient died. High cost users were defined as those in the top 10% of acute healthcare costs in the year prior to a person's hospitalization in which they died. Results: Among 252, 648 people who died in hospital, 25, 264 were high cost users (10%), 112, 506 were non-high cost users (44.5%) and 114, 878 had no prior acute care use (45.5%). After adjustment for age and sex, high cost user status was associated with a 14% increased odds of receiving an invasive intervention, a 15% increased odds of having major surgery, and an 8% lower odds of receiving palliative care compared to non-high cost users, but opposite when compared to patients without prior healthcare use. Conclusions: Many patients receive aggressive elements of end-of-life care during the hospitalization in which they die and a substantial number do not receive palliative care. Understanding how this care differs between those who were previously high- and non-high cost users may provide an opportunity to improve end of life care for whom better care planning and provision ought to be an equal priority.