Online Reputations: Comparing Hospital- and Patient-Generated Ratings in Academic Otolaryngology. (December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Online Reputations: Comparing Hospital- and Patient-Generated Ratings in Academic Otolaryngology. (December 2021)
- Main Title:
- Online Reputations: Comparing Hospital- and Patient-Generated Ratings in Academic Otolaryngology
- Authors:
- Basa, Krystyne
Jabbour, Nicolette
Rohlfing, Matthew
Schmoker, Sarah
Lawlor, Claire M.
Levi, Jessica
Sobin, Lindsay
Tracy, Jeremiah C.
Tracy, Lauren F. - Abstract:
- Objectives: This study compares hospital-generated online ratings to patient-generated online ratings in academic otolaryngology and evaluates physician factors influencing these results. Methods: Websites of academic otolaryngologists were assessed for inclusion of hospital-generated Press Ganey surveys. Corresponding scores on Healthgrades andVitals.com were identified via internet search. Hospital ratings were compared with patient-generated ratings, including score, demographics, and number of ratings. All data was collected between July 15th 2019 and August 22nd 2019. Results: 742 academic otolaryngologists with hospital-generated ratings were identified. Mean hospital-generated rating was significantly higher ((4.70, 95% CI 4.69-4.72) than patient-generated rating (Vitals:4.26, 95% CI 4.18-4.34, and Healthgrades:4.02, 95% CI 3.87-4.18; P < .001). In patient-generated rating, an increased number of rating scores (>20) was associated with male gender, professor ranking, and >30 years in practice ( P < .005). Physician demographics did not impact number of ratings in hospital-generated setting. With patient-generated, lower aggregate score was associated with professor ranking ( P = .001). In hospital-generated, lower score was associated with >30+ years in practice ( P = .023). Across all platforms, comprehensive otolaryngologists and neurotologists/otologists were rated lower in comparison to other specialties (PGS: P < .001, Vitals: P = .027, Healthgrades: PObjectives: This study compares hospital-generated online ratings to patient-generated online ratings in academic otolaryngology and evaluates physician factors influencing these results. Methods: Websites of academic otolaryngologists were assessed for inclusion of hospital-generated Press Ganey surveys. Corresponding scores on Healthgrades andVitals.com were identified via internet search. Hospital ratings were compared with patient-generated ratings, including score, demographics, and number of ratings. All data was collected between July 15th 2019 and August 22nd 2019. Results: 742 academic otolaryngologists with hospital-generated ratings were identified. Mean hospital-generated rating was significantly higher ((4.70, 95% CI 4.69-4.72) than patient-generated rating (Vitals:4.26, 95% CI 4.18-4.34, and Healthgrades:4.02, 95% CI 3.87-4.18; P < .001). In patient-generated rating, an increased number of rating scores (>20) was associated with male gender, professor ranking, and >30 years in practice ( P < .005). Physician demographics did not impact number of ratings in hospital-generated setting. With patient-generated, lower aggregate score was associated with professor ranking ( P = .001). In hospital-generated, lower score was associated with >30+ years in practice ( P = .023). Across all platforms, comprehensive otolaryngologists and neurotologists/otologists were rated lower in comparison to other specialties (PGS: P < .001, Vitals: P = .027, Healthgrades: P = .016). Conclusion: Hospital-generated ratings yield higher mean scores than patient-generated platforms. Between sources, Healthgrades.com scores were lower than those ofVitals.com . Professors with >30 years of practice generated more reviews in patient-generated ratings, and these physicians were generally rated lower. Access to patient-generated ratings is universal and physicians should be aware of variability between online rating platforms as scores may affect referrals and practice patterns. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Volume 130:Number 12(2021)
- Journal:
- Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology
- Issue:
- Volume 130:Number 12(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 130, Issue 12 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 130
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0130-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1317
- Page End:
- 1325
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12
- Subjects:
- online reviews -- patient satisfaction -- healthgrades -- physician demographics -- press ganey
Otolaryngology -- Periodicals
617.51 - Journal URLs:
- http://aor.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗
http://www.Annals.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/00034894211005985 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4894
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17622.xml