Design of patient specific bone stiffness mimicking scaffold. (December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rana, Masud; Chaudhuri, Abhik; Biswas, Jayanta Kumar; Karim, Sk Imran; Datta, Pallab; Karmakar, Santanu Kumar; Roychowdhury, Amit
• Is Part Of: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Volume 235:Number 12(2021)
• Page Start: 1453
• Page End: 1462
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Subjects: Porous bone graft -- patient specific design -- osseointegration -- effective stiffness -- finite element analysis; Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals; Medical instruments and apparatus -- Periodicals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1177/09544119211030715
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0954-4119

Abstract

The difference in stiffness of a patient's bone and bone implant causes stress shielding. Thus, implants which match the stiffness of bone of the patient result in better bone growth and osseointegration. Variation in porosity is one of the methods to obtain implants with different stiffness values. This study proposes a novel method to design biomimetic bone graft implant based on computed tomography (CT) scan data, that creates similar pre- and post-implant mechanical environment on peri-implant bone. The design methodology is demonstrated by taking three different sections of human femur bone, greater trochanter, diaphysis and epicondyle, with two different implant materials, Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-Mg. Bones from these three sections were replaced with porous implants of effective stiffness of replaced bone, as would have been required after a resection surgery. Models were simulated with physiological loading condition using finite element (FE) method. Variation of maximum von Mises stress and average strain on peri-prosthetic bone were found to be in the range of −6% to 10.7% and −7% to −17.9% for porous implants and 26% to 50% and −36% to −59% for solid implant respectively compared to natural bone. The results revealed that the porous implants, which have been designed based on CT scan data, can effectively produce mechanical response at peri-implant bone, which is very close to pre-implanted condition. Following this methodology, more osseointegration friendly mechanical environment can be achieved at peri-implant bone for any anatomical location independent of implant materials.