Assessment of breast positioning criteria in mammographic screening: Agreement between artificial intelligence software and radiographers. (December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Waade, Gunvor G; Danielsen, Anders Skyrud; Holen, Åsne S; Larsen, Marthe; Hanestad, Berit; Hopland, Nina-Merete; Kalcheva, Vanya; Hofvind, Solveig
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical screening. Volume 28:Number 4(2021)
• Page Start: 448
• Page End: 455
• Publication Date: 2021-12
• Subjects: Artificial intelligence -- breast neoplasm -- breast screening -- mammography -- radiography; Medical screening -- Periodicals; 362.177
• DOI: 10.1177/0969141321998718
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0969-1413

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the agreement between artificial intelligence software (AI) and radiographers in assessing breast positioning criteria for mammograms from standard digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Methods: Assessment of breast positioning was performed by AI and by four radiographers in pairs of two on 156 examinations of women screened in Bergen, April to September 2019, as part of BreastScreen Norway. Ten criteria were used; three for craniocaudal and seven for mediolateral-oblique view. The criteria evaluated the appearance of the nipple, breast rotation, pectoral muscle, inframammary fold and pectoral nipple line. Intraclass correlation and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) were used to investigate the correlation and agreement between the radiographer's assessments and AI. Results: The intraclass correlation for the pectoral nipple line between the radiographers and AI was >0.92. A substantial to almost perfect agreement (κ > 0.69) was observed between the radiographers and AI on the nipple in profile criterion. We observed a slight to moderate agreement for the other criteria (κ = 0.06–0.52) and generally a higher agreement between the two pairs of radiographers (mean κ = 0.70) than between the radiographers and AI (mean κ = 0.41). Conclusions: AI has great potential in evaluating breast position criteria in mammography by reducing subjectivity. However, varying agreement between radiographers and AI was observed. Standardized and evidence-based criteria for definitions, understandings and assessment methods are needed to reach optimal image quality in mammography.