Seismic performance evaluation of multi-story CBFs equipped with SMA-friction damping braces. (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Qiu, Canxing; Liu, Jiawang; Teng, Jun; Li, Zuohua; Du, Xiuli
• Is Part Of: Journal of intelligent material systems and structures. Volume 32:Number 15(2021)
• Page Start: 1725
• Page End: 1743
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: Concentrically braced frame -- SMA -- fuse -- residual deformation -- seismic resilience; Smart materials -- Periodicals; Intelligent control systems -- Periodicals; Artificial intelligence -- Periodicals; Matériaux intelligents -- Périodiques; Commande intelligente -- Périodiques; Intelligence artificielle -- Périodiques; 620.11
• DOI: 10.1177/1045389X20987000
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1045-389X

Abstract

Shape memory alloys (SMAs) gained increasing attentions from the perspective of seismic protection, primarily because of their excellent superelasticity, satisfactory damping and high fatigue life. However, the superelastic strain of SMAs has an upper limit, beyond which the material completes the austenite to martensite phase transformation and is followed by noticeable strain hardening. The strain hardening behavior would not only induce high force demand to the protected structures, but also cause unrecoverable deformation. More importantly, the SMAs may fracture if the deformation demand exceeds their capacity under severe earthquakes. In the case of installing SMA braces (SMABs) in the multi-story concentrically braced frames (CBFs), the material failure would lead to the malfunction of SMABs and this further causes building collapse. The friction mechanism could behave as a "fuse" through capping the strength demand at a constant level. Therefore, this paper suggests connecting the SMAB with a friction damper to achieve a novel brace, i.e. the SMA-friction damping brace (SMAFDB). A proof-of-concept test was carried out on a homemade specimen and the test results validated the novel brace behaves in a desirable manner. In addition, to explore the seismic response characteristics of the SMAFDB within structures, a six-story CBF equipped with SMAFDBs was designed and compared against those incorporated with SMABs or friction damping braces (FDBs) at the frequently occurred earthquake (FOE), design basis earthquake (DBE) and maximum considered earthquake (MCE). The comparative results show the SMAFDB is superior to the counterparts. Under the FOE and DBE ground motions, the SMAFDBs successfully eliminated residual deformations as the SMABs do, and achieved identical maximum interstory drift as the FDBs. Under the MCE ground motions, the SMAFDBs not only well addressed the brace failure problem that was possibly encountered in the SMABs, but also better controlled residual deformation than the FDBs.