How, in what contexts, and why do quality dashboards lead to improvements in care quality in acute hospitals? Protocol for a realist feasibility evaluation. Issue 2 (25th February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Randell, Rebecca; Alvarado, Natasha; McVey, Lynn; Greenhalgh, Joanne; West, Robert M; Farrin, Amanda; Gale, Chris; Parslow, Roger; Keen, Justin; Elshehaly, Mai; Ruddle, Roy A; Lake, Julia; Mamas, Mamas; Feltbower, Richard; Dowding, Dawn
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 10:Issue 2(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-02-25
• Subjects: audit -- health informatics -- clinical audit -- quality in health care -- qualitative research; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033208
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: National audits are used to monitor care quality and safety and are anticipated to reduce unexplained variations in quality by stimulating quality improvement (QI). However, variation within and between providers in the extent of engagement with national audits means that the potential for national audit data to inform QI is not being realised. This study will undertake a feasibility evaluation of QualDash, a quality dashboard designed to support clinical teams and managers to explore data from two national audits, the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) and the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet). Methods and analysis: Realist evaluation, which involves building, testing and refining theories of how an intervention works, provides an overall framework for this feasibility study. Realist hypotheses that describe how, in what contexts, and why QualDash is expected to provide benefit will be tested across five hospitals. A controlled interrupted time series analysis, using key MINAP and PICANet measures, will provide preliminary evidence of the impact of QualDash, while ethnographic observations and interviews over 12 months will provide initial insight into contexts and mechanisms that lead to those impacts. Feasibility outcomes include the extent to which MINAP and PICANet data are used, data completeness in the audits, and the extent to which participants perceive QualDash to be useful and express the intention to continue using it after the study period. Ethics and dissemination: The study has been approved by the University of Leeds School of Healthcare Research Ethics Committee. Study results will provide an initial understanding of how, in what contexts, and why quality dashboards lead to improvements in care quality. These will be disseminated to academic audiences, study participants, hospital IT departments and national audits. If the results show a trial is feasible, we will disseminate the QualDash software through a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.