Impact of regionalisation and case-volume on neonatal and perinatal mortality: an umbrella review. Issue 9 (25th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Walther, Felix; Küster, Denise Bianca; Bieber, Anja; Rüdiger, Mario; Malzahn, Jürgen; Schmitt, Jochen; Deckert, Stefanie
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 10:Issue 9(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-09-25
• Subjects: health policy -- quality in health care -- risk management -- neonatal intensive & critical care -- paediatric intensive & critical care -- neonatology; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037135
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: This umbrella review summarises and critically appraises the evidence on the effects of regulated or high-volume perinatal care on outcome among very low birth weight/very preterm infants born in countries with neonatal mortality <5/1000 births. Intervention/exposition: Perinatal regionalisation, centralisation, case-volume. Primary outcomes: Death. Secondary outcomes: Disability, discomfort, disease, dissatisfaction. Methods: On 29 November 2019 a systematic search in MEDLINE and Embase was performed and supplemented by hand search. Relevant systematic reviews (SRs) were critically appraised with A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2. Results: The literature search revealed 508 hits and three SRs were included. Effects of perinatal regionalisation were assessed in three (34 studies) and case-volume in one SR (6 studies). Centralisation has not been evaluated. The included SRs reported effects on 'death' (eg, neonatal), 'disability' (eg, mental status), 'discomfort' (eg, maternal sensitivity) and 'disease' (eg, intraventricular haemorrhages). 'Dissatisfactions' were not reported. The critical appraisal showed a heterogeneous quality ranging from moderate to critically low. A pooled effect estimate was reported once and showed a significant favour of perinatal regionalisation in terms of neonatal mortality (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.33–1.92). The qualitative evidence synthesis of the two SRs without pooled estimate suggests superiority of perinatal regionalisation in terms of different mortality and non-mortality outcomes. In one SR, contradictory results of lower neonatal mortality rates were reported in hospitals with higher birth volumes. Conclusions: Regionalised perinatal care seems to be a crucial care strategy to improve the survival of very low birth weight and preterm births. To overcome the low and critically low methodological quality and to consider additional clinical and patient-reported results that were not addressed by the SRs included, we recommend an updated SR. In the long term, an international, uniformly conceived and defined perinatal database could help to provide evidence-based recommendations on optimal strategies to regionalise perinatal care. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018094835.