Colonoscopy quality indicators in patients with and without prior colonic resection: A single‐centre prospective comparative study. (26th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bhat, Sameer; Wells, Cameron I.; Tan, Jeffrey; Bissett, Ian P.; Lill, Marianne
• Is Part Of: Colorectal disease. Volume 23:Number 7(2021)
• Page Start: 1755
• Page End: 1764
• Publication Date: 2021-03-26
• Subjects: adenoma detection rate -- bowel resection -- colonoscopy -- performance -- quality indicator; Colon (Anatomy) -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Rectum -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.34
• DOI: 10.1111/codi.15628
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-8910

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Effective colonoscopy relies on meeting rigorous quality control thresholds. Some earlier studies evaluating colonoscopy key performance indicators (KPIs) have excluded patients who have previously undergone colonic resection (i.e., they have a nonintact colon); such patients also deserve high‐quality colonoscopy. This study aimed to compare colonoscopy KPIs between patients with nonintact and intact colons. Method: Consecutive colonoscopies performed at Whanganui Hospital (New Zealand) between September 2016 and March 2020 were included. The primary outcome was the caecal or ileal intubation rate (CIIR). Secondary outcomes were the adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), colonoscope withdrawal time (CWT) and caecal or ileal intubation time (CIIT). Results: In total, 3017 colonoscopies were performed: 322 in nonintact colons and 2695 in intact colons. CIIR was significantly higher in nonintact than in intact colons (98.4% vs. 95.0%; P = 0.0086). When all colonoscopies were included, the CIIR was 95.4%; this value decreased to 95.0% when nonintact colonoscopies were excluded. However, the ADR (39.9% vs. 38.8%; P = 0.77) and PDR (58.4% vs. 59.1%; P = 0.86) were similar for both nonintact and intact colons. CWT ( P < 0.0001) and CIIT ( P < 0.0001) were significantly shorter in participants with nonintact colons. Conclusion: The CIIR exceeded recommended targets and was 3.4% higher in patients with nonintact than intact colons. Patients with nonintact colons comprise a small proportion of the overall colonoscopy cohort and it is unlikely that this small difference is relevant for most endoscopists or endoscopy units. The ADR and PDR were similar among patients with nonintact and intact colons, despite nonintact colonoscopies being significantly quicker. Patients with nonintact colons deserve high‐quality colonoscopy and therefore their KPIs should be included in colonoscopy performance reports.