Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With H‐Coil Coupled With Cycling for Improving Lower Limb Motor Function After Stroke: An Exploratory Study. Issue 5 (29th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chieffo, Raffaella; Giatsidis, Fabio; Santangelo, Roberto; Alyagon, Uri; Comola, Mauro; Zangen, Abraham; Comi, Giancarlo; Leocani, Letizia
• Is Part Of: Neuromodulaton. Volume 24:Issue 5(2021)
• Page Start: 916
• Page End: 922
• Publication Date: 2020-07-29
• Subjects: Gait disorders -- lower limb -- NIBS -- rehabilitation -- rTMS -- stroke; Central nervous system -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Central nervous system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1111/ner.13228
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1094-7159

Abstract

Abstract: Background/Objectives: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been recognized as a promising intervention for the treatment of post‐stroke motor deficits. Here, we explore safety, feasibility, and potential effectiveness of high‐frequency rTMS (HF‐rTMS) delivered with the Hesed coil (H‐coil) during active cycling on paretic lower extremity (LE) motor function in chronic stroke. Materials and Methods: Twelve subjects with a first‐ever stroke were recruited in this double‐blind, placebo controlled, crossover study. Eleven sessions of HF‐rTMS (40 2s‐trains of 20 Hz at 90% resting leg motor threshold) were delivered over the LE motor areas using the H‐coil during active cycling for three weeks. Each subject underwent both real and sham rTMS treatments separated by a four‐week washout period, in a random sequence. Vital signs were recorded before and after each rTMS session. Any discomfort related to stimulation and side effects were recorded. LE function was also evaluated with Fugl‐Meyer assessment (FMA‐LE), spasticity was assessed with modified‐Ashworth scale and measures of gait speed and endurance (10‐meter and 6‐min walk tests, respectively) were recorded. Results: No participant reported serious adverse effects. During real rTMS, 4 of 12 subjects reported mild side effects including transitory dizziness and muscle twitches on shoulder, so that intensity of stimulation initially set at 90% of RMT was reduced to 80% of RMT on average in these four subjects. Only real treatment was associated with a significant and sustained improvement in FMA‐LL (67% responders vs. 9% of the sham). Spasticity significantly ameliorated only after the real rTMS. Real treatment did not offer advantages on walking timed measures when compared with sham. Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that bilateral HF‐rTMS combined with cycling is safe and potentially effective in ameliorating paretic LE motor function and spasticity, rather than gait speed or endurance, in chronic stroke.