Measurement of Three‐Dimensional Internal Dynamic Strains in the Intervertebral Disc of the Lumbar Spine With Mechanical Loading and Golden‐Angle Radial Sparse Parallel‐Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Issue 2 (13th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Menon, Rajiv G.; Zibetti, Marcelo V.W.; Pendola, Martin; Regatte, Ravinder R.
• Is Part Of: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. Volume 54:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 486
• Page End: 496
• Publication Date: 2021-03-13
• Subjects: intervertebral disc -- magnetic resonance imaging -- cartilage deformation -- strain; Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27591
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1053-1807

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Noninvasive measurement of internal dynamic strain can be potentially useful to characterize spine intervertebral disc (IVD) in the setting of injury or degenerative disease. Purpose: To develop and demonstrate a noninvasive technique to quantify three‐dimensional (3D) internal dynamic strains in the IVD using a combination of static mechanical loading of the IVD using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐compatible ergometer. Study Type: Prospective. Subjects: Silicone gel phantom studies were conducted to assess strain variation with load and repeatability. Mechanical testing was done on the phantoms to confirm MR results. Eight healthy human volunteers (four men and four woman, age = 29 ± 5 years) underwent MRI using a rest, static loading, and recovery paradigm. Repeatability tests were conducted in three subjects. Field Strength/Sequence: MRI (3 T) with 3D continuous golden‐angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) and compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction. Assessment: CS reconstruction of the images, motion deformation, and Lagrangian strain maps were calculated for five IVD segments from L1/L2 to L5/S1. Statistical Tests: Ranges of displacement and strain in each subject and the resulting mean and standard deviation were calculated. Student t ‐tests were used to calculate changes in strain from loading to recovery. The correlation coefficient (CC) in the repeatability study was calculated. Results: The most compressive strain experienced by the IVD segments under loaded conditions was in the L4/L5 segment (−7.5 ± 2.9%). The change in minimum strain from load to recovery was the most for the L4/L5 segment (−7.5% to −5.0%, P = 0.026) and the least for the L1/L2 segment (−4.4% to −3.9%, P = 0.51). In vivo repeatability in three subjects shows strong correlation between scans in subjects done 6 months apart, with CCs equal to 0.86, 0.94, and 0.94 along principal directions. Data Conclusion: This study shows the feasibility of using static mechanical loading with continuous GRASP‐MRI acquisition with CS reconstruction to measure 3D internal dynamic strains in the spine IVD. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1