A Retrospective Comparison of Conventional versus Transverse Mini-Incision Technique for Carpal Tunnel Release. (12th December 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gülşen, İsmail; Ak, Hakan; Evcılı, Gökhan; Balbaloglu, Özlem; Sösüncü, Enver
• Other Names: Lüdemann W. Academic Editor.; Marchettini P. Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: ISRN neurology. Volume 2013(2013)
• Publication Date: 2013-12-12
• Subjects: Neurology -- Periodicals; Nervous System Diseases; Neurology; Neurology; Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1155/2013/721830
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2090-5505

Abstract

Abstract : Background . In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the results of two surgical techniques, conventional and transverse mini-incision. Materials and Methods . 95 patients were operated between 2011 and 2012 in Bitlis State Hospital. 50 patients were operated with conventional technique and 45 of them were operated with minimal transverse incision. Postoperative complications, incision site problems, and the time of starting to use their hands in daily activities were noted. Results . 95 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 48. 87 of them were female and 8 were male. There was no problem of incision site in both of the two surgical techniques. Only in one patient, anesthesia developed in minimal incision technique. The time of starting to use their hands in daily activities was 22, 2 days and 17 days in conventional and minimal incision technique, respectively. Conclusion . Two surgical techniques did not show superiority to each other in terms of postoperative complications and incision site problems except the time of starting to use their hands in daily activities.