Comparison of Octopus Semi-Automated Kinetic Perimetry and Humphrey Peripheral Static Perimetry in Neuro-Ophthalmic Cases. (15th July 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rowe, Fiona J.; Noonan, Carmel; Manuel, Melanie
• Other Names: Avunduk A. M. Academic Editor.; Quiroz-Mercado H. Academic Editor.; Szél Á. Academic Editor.; Wang I. J. Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: ISRN ophthalmology. Volume 2013(2013)
• Publication Date: 2013-07-15
• Subjects: Eye -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; Eye Diseases; Ophthalmology; Eye -- Diseases; Ophthalmology; Electronic journals; Periodical; Periodicals; 617.7
• DOI: 10.1155/2013/753202
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2090-5688

Abstract

Abstract : Aim . To compare semikinetic perimetry (SKP) on Octopus 900 perimetry to a peripheral static programme with Humphrey automated perimetry. Methods . Prospective cross-section study comparing Humphrey full field (FF) 120 two zone programme to a screening protocol for SKP on Octopus perimetry. Results were independently graded for presence/absence of field defect plus type and location of defect. Results . 64 patients (113 eyes) underwent dual perimetry assessment. Mean duration of assessment for SKP was 4.54 minutes ±0.18 and 6.17 ± 0.12 for FF120 (P = 0.0001 ). 80% of results were correctly matched for normal or abnormal visual fields using the I4e target versus FF120, and 73.5% were correctly matched using the I2e target versus FF120. When comparing Octopus results with combined I4e and I2e isopters to the FF120 result, a match for normal or abnormal fields was recorded in 87%. Conclusions . Humphrey perimetry test duration was generally longer than Octopus SKP. In the absence of kinetic perimetry, peripheral static suprathreshold programme options such as FF120 may be useful for detection of visual field defects. However, statokinetic dissociation may occur. Octopus SKP utilising both I4e and I2e targets provides detailed information of both the defect depth and size and may provide a more representative view of the actual visual field defect.