Parametric study of anterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (APECD). Issue 6 (26th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sun, Meng-Si; Yuchi, Chen-Xi; Cai, Xin-Yi; Du, Cheng-Fei; Mo, Zhong-Jun
• Is Part Of: Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Volume 24:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 687
• Page End: 699
• Publication Date: 2021-04-26
• Subjects: Percutaneous endoscopy -- cervical discectomy -- parameterization -- biomechanics -- finite element; Biomechanics -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Biomedical Engineering -- methods -- Periodicals; Computing Methodologies -- Periodicals; 612.7
• DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1846186
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1025-5842

Abstract

Abstract: Anterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (APECD) is a common treatment for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). In this study, the effects of various channel diameters and approach angles on cervical vertebrae on postoperative outcomes in APECD surgery were explored. A finite element model of intact cervical C3 -C7 was constructed and then modified to obtain six surgical models. Range of motion (ROM) and intradiscal pressure (IDP) were calculated under different conditions of flexion (Fle), extension (Ext), lateral bending, and axial rotation. During Fle and bending to the left (LB), the ROM was closer to the intact model when the angle of approach was 90°. During bending to the left (LB) and rotation to the left (LR), the ROM changed considerably (43.2%, 33.7%, respectively) where the angle of approach was 45°. As the surgical channel diameter increased, the extent of the change in ROM compared with the intact model also increased. IDP decreased by 48% and 49%, respectively, compared with the intact model at the C5 -C6 segment where the angle of approach was 45° and 60° during Fle, while it changed little at 90°, by less than 10%. The IDP was increased noticeably by 117.6%, 82.1%, and 105.8%, for channel diameters of 2, 3 and 4 mm, respectively. And declined noticeably during LB and LR (LB: 27.1%, 27.1%, 38.5%; LR: 37.4%, 35.5%, 48.7%). The results demonstrated that the shorter the surgical path, the smaller surgical diameter, the less the biomechanical influence on the cervical vertebra.