Development of a model care pathway for the management of Hymenoptera venom allergy: evidence‐based key interventions and indicators. Issue 1 (4th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bilò, Maria Beatrice; Corsi, Alice; Pravettoni, Valerio; Bignardi, Donatella; Bonadonna, Patrizia; Quercia, Oliviero; Mauro, Marina; Novembre, Elio; Micheletti, Rebecca; Papa, Roberto
• Is Part Of: Clinical and translational allergy. Volume 10:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-03-04
• Subjects: Care pathway -- Clinical pathway -- Core activity -- Flow diagram -- Hymenoptera venom allergy -- Key interventions -- Quality indicators; Allergy -- Periodicals; Immunology -- Periodicals; Allergy and Immunology -- Periodicals; Hypersensitivity -- Periodicals; Immune System Phenomena -- Periodicals; 616.97005
• DOI: 10.1186/s13601-020-00312-3
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7022

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Hymenoptera venom allergy (HVA) is an underestimated condition representing an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Preventing future allergic reactions in patients who have already developed a systemic reaction is based on the correct management of the acute phase of the reaction followed by a correct diagnosis and, where indicated, prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors and VIT. A possible strategy to optimize care processes and to improve outcomes is the implementation of a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Care Pathways, also known as Integrated Care Pathways or Clinical Pathways (CPWs). The aim of the care pathway is to enhance the quality of care by improving risk‐adjusted patient outcomes, promoting patient safety, increasing patient satisfaction, and optimizing the use of resources. To our knowledge, currently in Italy as well as in Europe, there is no CPWs codified for the management of HVA patients. This paper describes the development of the clinical content of a care pathway for the management of HVA. Methods: The methodology applied is based on the eight step method to build the clinical content of an evidence‐based care pathway suggested by Lodewijckx et al. Results: Three hundred and seventeen different clinical activities were extracted from the selected literature. The expert panel was involved in their evaluation, expressing a judgment of relevance through the Delphi study. As a result, 126 clinical activities were appraised to be valid and feasible. The final recommendations (126) were translated into 123 key interventions. Six indicators were produced by the clinical activities. Conclusion: A set of 123 key interventions and of six process indicators were found to be appropriate for the development and standardization of the clinical content of the Hymenoptera venom allergy care pathway.