Peak nasal inspiratory flow as outcome for provocation studies in allergen exposure chambers: a GA2 LEN study. Issue 1 (17th September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boelke, Georg; Berger, Uwe; Bergmann, Karl‐Christian; Bindslev‐Jensen, Carsten; Bousquet, Jean; Gildemeister, Julia; Jutel, Marek; Pfaar, Oliver; Sehlinger, Torsten; Zuberbier, Torsten
• Is Part Of: Clinical and translational allergy. Volume 7:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-09-17
• Subjects: Allergen exposure chamber (AEC) -- Allergy trial -- GA2 LEN chamber -- Peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) -- Provocation study; Allergy -- Periodicals; Immunology -- Periodicals; Allergy and Immunology -- Periodicals; Hypersensitivity -- Periodicals; Immune System Phenomena -- Periodicals; 616.97005
• DOI: 10.1186/s13601-017-0169-4
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7022

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The GA 2 LEN chamber has been developed as a novel mobile allergen exposure chamber (AEC) allowing standardized multicenter trials in allergy. Hitherto, subjective nasal symptom scores have been the most often used outcome parameter, but in standardized modern trials objective parameters are preferred. Despite its practicability, the objective parameter peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) has been rarely used for allergy trials in the setting of allergen exposure chambers. This study aims to evaluate PNIF as an outcome parameter for provocation studies in AECs. Methods: In a randomized controlled blinded setting subjects suffering from allergic rhinitis were exposed to grass pollen, birch pollen, house dust mite and/or placebo in the GA 2 LEN chamber. Different allergen concentrations were used to evaluate symptom severities. Patients had to perform PNIF before and every 30 min during a challenge using a portable PNIF meter. Results: 86 subjects participated in 203 challenges, altogether. House dust mite provocations caused the greatest reduction in PNIF values, followed by grass pollen and birch pollen. Provocations with every allergen or pollen concentration led to a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in PNIF compared to baseline. Furthermore, positive correlations were obtained between PNIF and peak expiratory flow, height and weight, and inverse correlations between PNIF and total nasal symptom score, nasal congestion score and visual analog scale of overall subjective symptoms. Conclusion: PNIF is a helpful and feasible tool for conducting provocation trials with allergens, especially grass pollen and house dust mite, in an AEC.