Evaluation of the applicability of the Immuno‐solid‐phase allergen chip (ISAC) assay in atopic patients in Singapore. Issue 1 (27th February 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Santosa, Amelia; Andiappan, Anand Kumar; Rotzschke, Olaf; Wong, Hung Chew; Chang, Amanda; Bigliardi‐Qi, Mei; Wang, De‐Yun; Bigliardi, Paul Lorenz
• Is Part Of: Clinical and translational allergy. Volume 5:Issue 1(2015)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2015-02-27
• Subjects: ISAC -- Specific IgE -- Atopy -- Sensitization -- Skin prick test; Allergy -- Periodicals; Immunology -- Periodicals; Allergy and Immunology -- Periodicals; Hypersensitivity -- Periodicals; Immune System Phenomena -- Periodicals; 616.97005
• DOI: 10.1186/s13601-015-0053-z
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7022

Abstract

Abstract: Background/Objective: Molecular‐based allergy diagnostics are gaining popularity in clinical practice. Our aim was to evaluate their role in the tropics, given the inherent genetic and environmental differences. Methods: We recruited subjects with history of atopy and collected data on demographics and atopic symptoms using validated questionnaires. Subjects underwent a series of skin prick tests (SPT). Serum total and specific IgE levels were measured using ImmunoCAP FEIA and ImmunoCAP ISAC®, respectively. We describe their pattern of sensitization and agreement between test methods. Results: A total of 135 subjects were recruited; mean ± SD age of 31.18 ± 12.72 years, 52.7% female. Allergic rhinitis (AR) was the most prevalent clinical manifestation of atopy (70.7%), followed by atopic dermatitis (AD) (50.5%) and asthma (26.2%). Polysensitization was seen in 51.1% of subjects by both SPT and ISAC. House dust mites (HDM) were the dominant allergen, with sensitization in 67.8% and 62% of subjects on SPT and ISAC, respectively. A group of subjects with monosensitization to B. tropicalis was identified. HDM sensitization was strongly associated with AR, while AD and asthma were not associated with sensitization to any allergen. Agreement between SPT and ISAC was mostly suboptimal. Greatest agreement was documented for the measurement of HDM sensitization with both methods (κ = 0.64). Sensitization to the bulk of the remaining allergens in the ISAC panel was infrequent. Conclusion: Multiplex methods should not be used as a screening tool, especially in a population with lower rates of polysensitization and a dominant sensitizing allergen. There may be a role in adjusting the antigen spectrum in the ISAC panel to regional differences.