Searching for prey in a three‐dimensional environment: hierarchical movements enhance foraging success in northern elephant seals. (20th June 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Adachi, Taiki; Costa, Daniel P.; Robinson, Patrick W.; Peterson, Sarah H.; Yamamichi, Masato; Naito, Yasuhiko; Takahashi, Akinori
• Editors: Goldbogen, Jeremy
• Is Part Of: Functional ecology. Volume 31:Number 2(2017)
• Page Start: 361
• Page End: 369
• Publication Date: 2016-06-20
• Subjects: area‐restricted search -- bio‐logging -- foraging behaviour -- hierarchical patch system -- Lévy walk -- marine predator -- scale‐dependent movement -- three‐dimensional movement; Ecology -- Periodicals; 574.505
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12686
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-8463

Abstract

Summary: Foraging theory predicts that predators adjust their movements according to the spatial distribution of prey. Since prey is often patchily distributed, area‐restricted search (ARS) behaviour, characterized by sinuous search paths of predators with increased turning frequency, should be effective in foraging. However, it remains unclear whether ARS behaviour actually enhances foraging success in free‐ranging animals, especially in marine animals that forage in a three‐dimensional (3D) environment. Here, we reconstructed 3D dive paths of a highly pelagic marine predator, the northern elephant seal ( n = 3), with multisensor data loggers that recorded depth, tri‐axis acceleration, tri‐axis magnetism and swim speed. We identified spatial scales of volume‐restricted search (VRS, termed for 3D ARS) behaviour using spherical first‐passage time analysis on 3D dive paths, accompanied with quantifying feeding rates in VRS by using mandible accelerometers that recorded feeding events. Seals exhibited VRS behaviour at two spatial scales (radius of spheres): small‐VRS (8–10 m) and large‐VRS (17–19 m). Most feeding events occurred in VRS zones (78 and 86% for small and large‐VRS, respectively), although VRS accounted for a small proportion of bottom phase of dives in distance travelled. This suggests a strong link between VRS behaviour and foraging success. There was a hierarchical structure to the VRS; most small‐VRS (95%) were nested within large‐VRS (i.e. nested VRS). Importantly, nested VRS had significantly higher feeding rates than non‐nested VRS, because nested VRS contained small‐ and large‐VRS with higher and lower feeding rates, respectively. These results suggest that seals forage on mesopelagic prey in a hierarchical patch system where high‐density patches at small scales are nested within low‐density patches at larger scales. We demonstrated that seals employed scale‐dependent, hierarchical 3D movements and that underwater fine‐scale sinuous movements (i.e. VRS) were strongly linked to higher foraging success, particularly within nested VRS zones. We suggest that seals enhanced foraging success by employing hierarchical movements that possibly reflect the hierarchical property of prey distribution. Although recent studies advocate that optimal searching behaviour would be scale‐independent (e.g. Lévy walk), our study suggests that scale‐dependent processes are important components of successful foraging behaviour. Abstract : Lay Summary