Comparison of phase‐constrained parallel MRI approaches: Analogies and differences. Issue 3 (4th April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Blaimer, Martin; Heim, Marius; Neumann, Daniel; Jakob, Peter M.; Kannengiesser, Stephan; Breuer, Felix A.
• Is Part Of: Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 75:Issue 3(2016:Mar.)
• Page Start: 1086
• Page End: 1099
• Publication Date: 2015-04-04
• Subjects: parallel MRI -- GRAPPA -- ESPIRiT -- phase‐constrained reconstruction -- conjugate symmetry -- virtual coil; Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals; Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals; 616.07548
• DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25685
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0740-3194

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Phase‐constrained parallel MRI approaches have the potential for significantly improving the image quality of accelerated MRI scans. The purpose of this study was to investigate the properties of two different phase‐constrained parallel MRI formulations, namely the standard phase‐constrained approach and the virtual conjugate coil (VCC) concept utilizing conjugate k‐space symmetry. Methods: Both formulations were combined with image‐domain algorithms (SENSE) and a mathematical analysis was performed. Furthermore, the VCC concept was combined with k‐space algorithms (GRAPPA and ESPIRiT) for image reconstruction. In vivo experiments were conducted to illustrate analogies and differences between the individual methods. Furthermore, a simple method of improving the signal‐to‐noise ratio by modifying the sampling scheme was implemented. Results: For SENSE, the VCC concept was mathematically equivalent to the standard phase‐constrained formulation and therefore yielded identical results. In conjunction with k‐space algorithms, the VCC concept provided more robust results when only a limited amount of calibration data were available. Additionally, VCC‐GRAPPA reconstructed images provided spatial phase information with full resolution. Conclusions: Although both phase‐constrained parallel MRI formulations are very similar conceptually, there exist important differences between image‐domain and k‐space domain reconstructions regarding the calibration robustness and the availability of high‐resolution phase information. Magn Reson Med 75:1086–1099, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.