Understanding uncertainty in temperature effects on vector‐borne disease: a Bayesian approach. Issue 1 (1st January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johnson, Leah R.; Ben-Horin, Tal; Lafferty, Kevin D.; M Nally, Amy; Mordecai, Erin; Paaijmans, Krijn P.; Pawar, Samraat; Ryan, Sadie J.
• Is Part Of: Ecology. Volume 96:Issue 1(2015)
• Page Start: 203
• Page End: 213
• Publication Date: 2015-01-01
• Subjects: Anopheles gambiae -- basic reproductive number -- Bayesian statistics -- climate envelope -- malaria -- Plasmodium falciparum -- sensitivity analysis -- thermal physiology -- uncertainty analysis; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Écologie -- Périodiques; Ecologie; Écologie; Écologie animale; Écologie végétale; Ecology; Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1890/13-1964.1
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-9658

Abstract

Abstract : Extrinsic environmental factors influence the distribution and population dynamics of many organisms, including insects that are of concern for human health and agriculture. This is particularly true for vector‐borne infectious diseases like malaria, which is a major source of morbidity and mortality in humans. Understanding the mechanistic links between environment and population processes for these diseases is key to predicting the consequences of climate change on transmission and for developing effective interventions. An important measure of the intensity of disease transmission is the reproductive number R 0 . However, understanding the mechanisms linking R 0 and temperature, an environmental factor driving disease risk, can be challenging because the data available for parameterization are often poor. To address this, we show how a Bayesian approach can help identify critical uncertainties in components of R 0 and how this uncertainty is propagated into the estimate of R 0 . Most notably, we find that different parameters dominate the uncertainty at different temperature regimes: bite rate from 15°C to 25°C; fecundity across all temperatures, but especially ~25–32°C; mortality from 20°C to 30°C; parasite development rate at ~15–16°C and again at ~33–35°C. Focusing empirical studies on these parameters and corresponding temperature ranges would be the most efficient way to improve estimates of R 0 . While we focus on malaria, our methods apply to improving process‐based models more generally, including epidemiological, physiological niche, and species distribution models.