Ara h 7 isoforms share many linear epitopes: Are 3D epitopes crucial to elucidate divergent abilities?. Issue 11 (6th October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ehlers, Anna M.; Klinge, Marco; Suer, Waltraud; Weimann, Yvonne; Knulst, André C.; Besa, Frithjof; Le, Thuy‐My; Otten, Henny G.
• Is Part Of: Clinical & experimental allergy. Volume 49:Issue 11(2019)
• Page Start: 1512
• Page End: 1519
• Publication Date: 2019-10-06
• Subjects: 2S albumins -- Ara h 7 isoforms -- food allergy -- linear epitopes -- peanut; Allergy -- Periodicals; Immunology -- Periodicals; 616.97
• DOI: 10.1111/cea.13496
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0954-7894

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The peanut allergens Ara h 2, h 6, and h 7 are potent allergens and can trigger severe reactions. Ara h 7 consists of three isoforms differing in their ability to induce basophil degranulation, whereas the ability of Ara h 7.0201 is comparable to Ara h 2 and 6 as shown in previous literature. Objective: To identify linear epitopes of Ara h 7.0101, Ara h 7.0201 and Ara h 7.0301 recognized by IgE and IgG4 from patients sensitized to Ara h 7 and to investigate their potential to elucidate divergent abilities of the Ara h 7 isoforms in inducing basophil activation. Methods: Linear epitopes recognized by IgE and IgG4 were mapped by peptide microarray analysis containing 15‐mer peptides of Ara h 2.0201, 6, 7.0101, 7.0201 and 7.0301 and 39 peanut allergic patients sensitized to Ara h 7 (discovery). For validation, 20‐mer peptides containing the minimal epitope and surrounding amino acids were incubated with 25 sensitized patients and 10 controls (validation). Results: Three out of 14 linear epitopes were unique for each isoform (Ara h 7.0101: aa 97‐109; Ara h 7.0201: aa 122‐133; Ara h 7.0301: aa 65‐74) but scarcely recognized by IgE. The main linear IgE epitope (aa 51‐57) located in the long flexible loop of all Ara h 7 isoforms was bound by antibodies from 31% of the patients (discovery and validation cohort). Regarding IgG4, 55% of the patients recognized an epitope present on all isoforms (aa 55‐65), whereas epitope aa 129‐137, only present on Ara h 7.0101/0.0301, was recognized by 38% of the patients. Recognition was highly individual, although 20% of the patients recognized any linear epitope neither by IgE nor by IgG4 despite a low mean z‐score of ≥ 1.7. Remarkably, only 50% of the patients recognized one or more epitopes by IgE. Conclusion & Clinical Relevance: Ara h 7 isoforms share many linear epitopes being easily accessible for antibody binding. Unique epitopes, essential to elucidate divergent potencies, were scarcely recognized, suggesting a crucial involvement of conformational epitopes.