Bridging Ecological Stoichiometry and Nutritional Geometry with homeostasis concepts and integrative models of organism nutrition. (27th July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sperfeld, Erik; Wagner, Nicole D.; Halvorson, Halvor M.; Malishev, Matthew; Raubenheimer, David
• Editors: Harwood, James
• Is Part Of: Functional ecology. Volume 31:Number 2(2017)
• Page Start: 286
• Page End: 296
• Publication Date: 2016-07-27
• Subjects: dynamic energy budget -- geometric framework for nutrition -- homeostatic regulation -- metabolic theory -- nutrient frameworks -- nutritional ecology -- nutritional homeostasis -- stoichiometric homeostasis; Ecology -- Periodicals; 574.505
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12707
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-8463

Abstract

Summary: The role of nutrition in linking animals with their environment is increasingly seen as fundamental to explain ecological interactions. The two currently predominant frameworks for exploring questions in nutritional ecology – Nutritional Geometry (NG) and Ecological Stoichiometry (ES) – share common features, but also differ in their goals and origins. NG originates from behavioural ecology using terrestrial insects as model organisms in tightly controlled feeding experiments, while ES originates from biogeochemistry focusing on the transfer of key elements across trophic levels, mainly in aquatic environments. Here, we review the history of these two complementary frameworks, emphasizing the key concepts defining their respective aims, methodologies and focal taxa to answer questions at different ecological scales. We identify and explore homeostasis as a shared conceptual cornerstone of each framework that can be used to bridge knowledge gaps and for developing new hypotheses within nutritional ecology. Expanding on the concept of homeostasis, we introduce dynamic energy budget (DEB) models as a general way to address homeostatic regulation at its fundamental level. Specifically, we describe how a two‐reserve DEB model can be used to track metabolic pathways of nutrients as well as elements and suggest that multi‐reserve DEB models, when integrated and parameterized with NG and ES concepts, can form powerful components of agent‐based models to predict how animal nutrition influences individual and trophic interactions in food webs. Abstract : Lay Summary