Livestock Production Challenges and Improved Forage Production Efforts in the Damot Gale District of Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. (28th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mengistu, Shimelis; Nurfeta, Ajebu; Tolera, Adugna; Bezabih, Melkamu; Adie, Abera; Wolde-meskel, Endalkachew; Zenebe, Mesfin
• Other Names: Iqbal Mudassar Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Advances in agriculture. Volume 2021(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-06-28
• Subjects: Agriculture -- Periodicals; Agriculture; Periodicals; 630
• DOI: 10.1155/2021/5553659
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2356-654X

Abstract

Abstract : This study was conducted to identify major livestock production constraints and improved forage production efforts in the Damot Gale district. Four representative kebeles, two associated with our NGO project and two from nonproject outreach activities, were selected. Forty farmers from each kebele were randomly chosen for the purpose of individual interviews using a semistructured questionnaire. Data collected were analyzed using SPSS (version 20) and Excel. The topmost livestock production constraint was feed shortage where a larger proportion of farmers (75.6%) suffered from the problem with higher (p ≤ 0.01) severity in nonproject intervention areas. Of these, 38.6% were challenged for a period of three months while another 61.4% suffered for about four months. Purchasing grass (31.4%) and concentrate (33.5%) and feeding enset ( Ensete ventricosum ) leaf (21.49%) were the most commonly adopted coping mechanisms to alleviate feed shortages during the dry season, while using purchased grass and enset leaf was the main coping strategy in nonproject intervention (p ≤ 0.01) areas. The majority of households (90.75%) participate in improved forage production regardless of farm size. Desho grass ( Pennisetum pedicellatum ) (71.38%) and elephant grass ( Pennisetum purpureum ) (42.63%) are the most common improved forages in both study areas. These forages are produced for the purpose of two or more functions (feed, cash, and preventing erosion) that vary (p ≤ 0.01) among intervention status. Major niche locations adopted for improved forage production include farm land, soil and water conservation structures, and perimeter fencing. Greatest constraints on improved forage production were seed/material shortage followed by land shortage and lack of awareness. Project intervention (p ≤ 0.01), tropical livestock unit (TLU) holding (p ≤ 0.01), and forage seed/planting material access (p < 0.05) were identified as factors (among others) having significant relationship with improved forage development. Strong extension services and efficient input delivery for farmers are vital to support profitable livestock production and resource utilization.