Close encounters and the illusion of accountability in the sharing economy. Issue 5 (17th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McDaid, Emma; Boedker, Christina; Free, Clinton
• Is Part Of: Accounting auditing & accountability journal. Volume 32:Issue 5(2019)
• Page Start: 1437
• Page End: 1466
• Publication Date: 2019-06-17
• Subjects: Goffman -- Crowdbased accountability -- Airbnb -- Online reviews -- Face-works -- Social cooling; 657
• DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-09-2017-3156
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0951-3574

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Online ratings and reviews have recently emerged as mechanisms to facilitate accountability and transparency in the provision of goods and services. The purpose of this paper is to examine the nature and outcome of the accountability that online ratings and reviews create in the sharing economy. Design/methodology/approach: The study draws on 30 face-to-face and Skype interviews with Airbnb guests and hosts as well as on secondary materials, including content from Airbnb data analytic reports. Findings: The authors demonstrate that face-saving practices widely condition user ratings and comments. Face saving occurs when individuals attempt to preserve their own identity and the identity of others during a social interaction. At Airbnb, the authors find that reviewers adopt three distinct face-saving strategies: the use of private reviewing channels, the creation of tactful reviews and refraining from reviewing entirely. The authors also find that users are sceptical of rating metrics and public comments and draw upon a wide range of alternative sources, such as private messaging and other publicly available resources, in their decision making. Originality/value: This paper highlights the overwhelmingly positive character of Airbnb ratings and reviews. It proposes the concept of crowdbased accountability as a limited, partial form of assurance for sharing economy users. Guests and hosts alike prioritise face-saving practices over reviewer responsibilities to provide authentic, reliable accounts to the public. Consequently, reviewers effectively remove the risk of sanctions for those in the network who underperform.