The effect of cervical intervertebral disc degeneration on the motion path of instantaneous center of rotation at degenerated and adjacent segments: A finite element analysis. (July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sang, Dacheng; Du, Cheng-Fei; Wu, Bingxuan; Cai, Xin-Yi; Cui, Wei; Yuchi, Chen-Xi; Rong, Tianhua; Sang, Hongpeng; Liu, Baoge
• Is Part Of: Computers in biology and medicine. Volume 134(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-07
• Subjects: Finite element -- Cervical spine -- Cervical disc degeneration -- Instantaneous center of rotation -- Kinematics -- Biomechanics -- Cervical disc prosthesis; Medicine -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Biology -- Data processing -- Periodicals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104426
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0010-4825

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The motion path of instantaneous center of rotation (ICR) is a crucial kinematic parameter to dynamically characterize cervical spine intervertebral patterns of motion; however, few studies have evaluated the effect of cervical disc degeneration (CDD) on ICR motion path. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of CDD on the ICR motion path of degenerated and adjacent segments. Method: A validated nonlinear three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of a healthy adult cervical spine was used. Progressive degeneration was simulated with six FE models by modifying intervertebral disc height and material properties, anterior osteophyte size, and degree of endplate sclerosis at the C5–C6 level. All models were subjected to a pure moment of 1 Nm and a compressive follower load of 73.6 N to simulate physical motion. ICR motion paths were compared among different models. Results: The normal FE model results were consistent with those of previous studies. In degenerative models, average ICR motion paths shifted significantly anterior at the degenerated segment ( β = 0.27 mm; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.32) and posterior at the proximal adjacent segment ( β = −0.09 mm; 95% CI: −0.15, −0.02) than those of the normal model. Conclusion: CDD significantly affected ICR motion paths at the degenerated and proximal adjacent segments. The changes at adjacent segments may be a result of compensatory mechanisms to maintain the balance of the cervical spine. Surgical treatment planning should take into account the restoration of ICR motion path to normal. These findings could provide a basis for prosthesis design and clinical practice.