Community health worker interventions for older adults with complex health needs: A systematic review. Issue 6 (18th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kennedy, Meaghan A.; Hatchell, Kayla E.; DiMilia, Peter R.; Kelly, Stephanie M.; Blunt, Heather B.; Bagley, Pamela J.; LaMantia, Michael A.; Reynolds, Charles F.; Crow, Rebecca S.; Maden, Tara N.; Kelly, S. Logan; Kihwele, Jacqueline M.; Batsis, John A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Volume 69:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 1670
• Page End: 1682
• Publication Date: 2021-03-18
• Subjects: older adults -- community health workers -- complex health needs; Geriatrics -- Periodicals; 618.97
• DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17078
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-8614

Abstract

Abstract: Background/Objectives: The number of older adults with complex health needs is growing, and this population experiences disproportionate morbidity and mortality. Interventions led by community health workers (CHWs) can improve clinical outcomes in the general adult population with multimorbidity, but few studies have investigated CHW‐delivered interventions in older adults. Design: We systematically reviewed the impact of CHW interventions on health outcomes among older adults with complex health needs. We searched for English‐language articles from database inception through April 2020 using seven databases. PROSPERO protocol registration CRD42019118761. Setting: Any U.S. or international setting, including clinical and community‐based settings. Participants: Adults aged 60 years or older with complex health needs, defined in this review as multimorbidity, frailty, disability, or high‐utilization. Interventions: Interventions led by a CHW or similar role consistent with the American Public Health Association's definition of CHWs. Measurements: Pre‐defined health outcomes (chronic disease measures, general health measures, treatment adherence, quality of life, or functional measures) as well as qualitative findings. Results: Of 5671 unique records, nine studies met eligibility criteria, including four randomized controlled trials, three quasi‐experimental studies, and two qualitative studies. Target population and intervention characteristics were variable, and studies were generally of low‐to‐moderate methodological quality. Outcomes included mood, functional status and disability, social support, well‐being and quality of life, medication knowledge, and certain health conditions (e.g., falls, cognition). Results were mixed with several studies demonstrating significant effects on mood and function, including one high‐quality RCT, while others noted no significant intervention effects on outcomes. Conclusion: CHW‐led interventions may have benefit for older adults with complex health needs, but additional high‐quality studies are needed to definitively determine the effectiveness of CHW interventions in this population. Integration of CHWs into geriatric clinical settings may be a strategy to deliver evidence‐based interventions and improve clinical outcomes in complex older adults. Abstract : See related editorial by Thompson et al .