Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Impact of RAPid IDentification and Susceptibility Testing for Gram-negative Bacteremia: RAPIDS-GN. (6th May 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Impact of RAPid IDentification and Susceptibility Testing for Gram-negative Bacteremia: RAPIDS-GN. (6th May 2020)
- Main Title:
- Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinical Impact of RAPid IDentification and Susceptibility Testing for Gram-negative Bacteremia: RAPIDS-GN
- Authors:
- Banerjee, Ritu
Komarow, Lauren
Virk, Abinash
Rajapakse, Nipunie
Schuetz, Audrey N
Dylla, Brenda
Earley, Michelle
Lok, Judith
Kohner, Peggy
Ihde, Sherry
Cole, Nicolynn
Hines, Lisa
Reed, Katelyn
Garner, Omai B
Chandrasekaran, Sukantha
de St. Maurice, Annabelle
Kanatani, Meganne
Curello, Jennifer
Arias, Rubi
Swearingen, William
Doernberg, Sarah B
Patel, Robin - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Rapid blood culture diagnostics are of unclear benefit for patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients with GNB BSIs who had blood culture testing with standard-of-care (SOC) culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) vs rapid organism identification (ID) and phenotypic AST using the Accelerate Pheno System (RAPID). Methods: Patients with positive blood cultures with Gram stains showing GNB were randomized to SOC testing with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) review or RAPID with AS. The primary outcome was time to first antibiotic modification within 72 hours of randomization. Results: Of 500 randomized patients, 448 were included (226 SOC, 222 RAPID). Mean (standard deviation) time to results was faster for RAPID than SOC for organism ID (2.7 [1.2] vs 11.7 [10.5] hours; P < .001) and AST (13.5 [56] vs 44.9 [12.1] hours; P < .001). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to first antibiotic modification was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for overall antibiotics (8.6 [2.6–27.6] vs 14.9 [3.3–41.1] hours; P = .02) and gram-negative antibiotics (17.3 [4.9–72] vs 42.1 [10.1–72] hours; P < .001). Median (IQR) time to antibiotic escalation was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for antimicrobial-resistant BSIs (18.4 [5.8–72] vs 61.7 [30.4–72] hours; P = .01). There were no differences between the arms in patientAbstract: Background: Rapid blood culture diagnostics are of unclear benefit for patients with gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing outcomes of patients with GNB BSIs who had blood culture testing with standard-of-care (SOC) culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) vs rapid organism identification (ID) and phenotypic AST using the Accelerate Pheno System (RAPID). Methods: Patients with positive blood cultures with Gram stains showing GNB were randomized to SOC testing with antimicrobial stewardship (AS) review or RAPID with AS. The primary outcome was time to first antibiotic modification within 72 hours of randomization. Results: Of 500 randomized patients, 448 were included (226 SOC, 222 RAPID). Mean (standard deviation) time to results was faster for RAPID than SOC for organism ID (2.7 [1.2] vs 11.7 [10.5] hours; P < .001) and AST (13.5 [56] vs 44.9 [12.1] hours; P < .001). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to first antibiotic modification was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for overall antibiotics (8.6 [2.6–27.6] vs 14.9 [3.3–41.1] hours; P = .02) and gram-negative antibiotics (17.3 [4.9–72] vs 42.1 [10.1–72] hours; P < .001). Median (IQR) time to antibiotic escalation was faster in the RAPID arm vs the SOC arm for antimicrobial-resistant BSIs (18.4 [5.8–72] vs 61.7 [30.4–72] hours; P = .01). There were no differences between the arms in patient outcomes. Conclusions: Rapid organism ID and phenotypic AST led to faster changes in antibiotic therapy for gram-negative BSIs. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03218397. Abstract : This randomized, controlled trial demonstrates that compared with conventional testing, a rapid phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing method implemented together with antibiotic stewardship can facilitate significantly faster antibiotic modifications during treatment of gram-negative bloodstream infections. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical infectious diseases. Volume 73:Number 1(2021)
- Journal:
- Clinical infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 73:Number 1(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 73, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 73
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0073-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- e39
- Page End:
- e46
- Publication Date:
- 2020-05-06
- Subjects:
- blood cultures -- antibiotic susceptibility testing -- rapid diagnostic -- bloodstream infection -- gram negative
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://cid.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/10584838.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/cid/ciaa528 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1058-4838
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.293860
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17426.xml