SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and subsequent infection risk in healthy young adults: a prospective cohort study. Issue 7 (July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Letizia, Andrew G; Ge, Yongchao; Vangeti, Sindhu; Goforth, Carl; Weir, Dawn L; Kuzmina, Natalia A; Balinsky, Corey A; Chen, Hua Wei; Ewing, Dan; Soares-Schanoski, Alessandra; George, Mary-Catherine; Graham, William D; Jones, Franca; Bharaj, Preeti; Lizewski, Rhonda A; Lizewski, Stephen E; Marayag, Jan; Marjanovic, Nada; Miller, Clare M; Mofsowitz, Sagie; Nair, Venugopalan D; Nunez, Edgar; Parent, Danielle M; Porter, Chad K; Santa Ana, Ernesto; Schilling, Megan; Stadlbauer, Daniel; Sugiharto, Victor A; Termini, Michael; Sun, Peifang; Tracy, Russell P; Krammer, Florian; Bukreyev, Alexander; Ramos, Irene; Sealfon, Stuart C;
• Is Part Of: Lancet. Volume 9:Issue 7(2021)
• Page Start: 712
• Page End: 720
• Publication Date: 2021-07
• Subjects: Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.2005
• DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00158-2
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2213-2600

Abstract

Summary: Background: Whether young adults who are infected with SARS-CoV-2 are at risk of subsequent infection is uncertain. We investigated the risk of subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection among young adults seropositive for a previous infection. Methods: This analysis was performed as part of the prospective COVID-19 Health Action Response for Marines study (CHARM). CHARM included predominantly male US Marine recruits, aged 18–20 years, following a 2-week unsupervised quarantine at home. After the home quarantine period, upon arrival at a Marine-supervised 2-week quarantine facility (college campus or hotel), participants were enrolled and were assessed for baseline SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity, defined as a dilution of 1:150 or more on receptor-binding domain and full-length spike protein ELISA. Participants also completed a questionnaire consisting of demographic information, risk factors, reporting of 14 specific COVID-19-related symptoms or any other unspecified symptom, and brief medical history. SARS-CoV-2 infection was assessed by PCR at weeks 0, 1, and 2 of quarantine and participants completed a follow-up questionnaire, which included questions about the same COVID-19-related symptoms since the last study visit. Participants were excluded at this stage if they had a positive PCR test during quarantine. Participants who had three negative swab PCR results during quarantine and a baseline serum serology test at the beginning of the supervised quarantine that identified them as seronegative or seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 then went on to basic training at Marine Corps Recruit Depot—Parris Island. Three PCR tests were done at weeks 2, 4, and 6 in both seropositive and seronegative groups, along with the follow-up symptom questionnaire and baseline neutralising antibody titres on all subsequently infected seropositive and selected seropositive uninfected participants (prospective study period). Findings: Between May 11, 2020, and Nov 2, 2020, we enrolled 3249 participants, of whom 3168 (98%) continued into the 2-week quarantine period. 3076 (95%) participants, 2825 (92%) of whom were men, were then followed up during the prospective study period after quarantine for 6 weeks. Among 189 seropositive participants, 19 (10%) had at least one positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 during the 6-week follow-up (1·1 cases per person-year). In contrast, 1079 (48%) of 2247 seronegative participants tested positive (6·2 cases per person-year). The incidence rate ratio was 0·18 (95% CI 0·11–0·28; p<0·001). Among seropositive recruits, infection was more likely with lower baseline full-length spike protein IgG titres than in those with higher baseline full-length spike protein IgG titres (hazard ratio 0·45 [95% CI 0·32–0·65]; p<0·001). Infected seropositive participants had viral loads that were about 10-times lower than those of infected seronegative participants (ORF1ab gene cycle threshold difference 3·95 [95% CI 1·23–6·67]; p=0·004). Among seropositive participants, baseline neutralising titres were detected in 45 (83%) of 54 uninfected and in six (32%) of 19 infected participants during the 6 weeks of observation (ID50 difference p<0·0001). Interpretation: Seropositive young adults had about one-fifth the risk of subsequent infection compared with seronegative individuals. Although antibodies induced by initial infection are largely protective, they do not guarantee effective SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation activity or immunity against subsequent infection. These findings might be relevant for optimisation of mass vaccination strategies. Funding: Defense Health Agency and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.