Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial treatments for disruptive behaviour disorders in children and adolescents: study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Issue 6 (29th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Lin; Ren, Zhihong; Ma, Xueyao; Hazer-Rau, Dilana; Jiang, Guangrong; Zhao, Chunxiao; Zhao, Ziyi; Liu, Qianzi; Yuan, Fenghui
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 11:Issue 6(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-06-29
• Subjects: child & adolescent psychiatry -- mental health -- impulse control disorders; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046091
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Disruptive behaviour disorders are common among children and adolescents, with negative impacts on the youths, their families and society. Although multiple psychosocial treatments are effective in decreasing the symptoms of disruptive behaviour disorders, comprehensive evidence regarding the comparative efficacy and acceptability between these treatments is still lacking. Therefore, we propose a systematic review and network meta-analysis, integrating both direct and indirect comparisons to obtain a hierarchy of treatment efficacy and acceptability. Methods and analysis: The present protocol will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Ten databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, OpenDissertations, The Cochrane Library, Embase and CINAHL, will be searched from inception for randomised controlled trials of psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behaviour disorders, without restrictions on language, publication year and status. The primary outcomes will be efficacy at post-treatment (severity of disruptive behaviour disorders at post-treatment) and acceptability (dropout rate for any reason) of psychosocial treatments. The secondary outcomes will involve efficacy at follow-up, severity of internalising problems and improvement of social functioning. Two authors will independently conduct the study selection and data extraction, assess the risk of bias using the revised Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool and evaluate the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to network meta-analysis. We will perform Bayesian network meta-analyses with a random effects model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings. Ethics and dissemination: The research does not require ethical approval. Results are planned to be published in journals or presented at conferences. The network meta-analysis will provide information on a hierarchy of treatment efficacy and acceptability and help make a clinical treatment choice. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020197448.