Vehicle collision prediction at intersections based on comparison of minimal distance between vehicles and dynamic thresholds. Issue 10 (10th October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Pin; Chan, Ching‐Yao
• Is Part Of: IET intelligent transport systems. Volume 11:Issue 10(2017)
• Page Start: 676
• Page End: 684
• Publication Date: 2017-10-10
• Subjects: traffic engineering computing; vehicle collision prediction algorithm -- minimal future distance -- future distance -- two‐level dynamic threshold -- global positioning system -- inertial navigation system -- MFD -- emergency warning -- normal warning situations; Intelligent transportation systems -- Periodicals; Electronics in transportation -- Periodicals; 388.31205
• DOI: 10.1049/iet-its.2017.0065
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-956X

Abstract

Abstract : Accurate collision prediction algorithms are important to provide drivers reliable warning messages. This study introduces a novel approach for collision prediction at intersections. The algorithm involves the use of an index called 'minimal future distance (MFD)', which is defined to be a future distance (FD) between the subject vehicle and the primary other vehicle, and a two‐level dynamic threshold for performing the collision prediction task. Real‐time vehicle motion information and surrounding road geometry are utilised to forecast FDs and identify MFD within an upcoming time horizon. The dynamic threshold in both emergency warning and normal warning situations consists of two parts, a vehicle heading direction‐related part and a speed value‐related part. Potential collisions are determined by the comparison of MFD with different dynamic thresholds in different driving scenarios. The combined use of vehicle real‐time state and road geometry in the algorithm significantly increased the collision prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the use of dynamic thresholds ensured the promptness and robustness of the collision warning system. Simulation results show that the false positive rate and false negative rate of severe collisions at intersections can be robustly eliminated and those of marginal collisions can be kept low at 2.4 and 3.6%, respectively.