Faecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridioides difficile infection: Four years' experience of the Netherlands Donor Feces Bank. Issue 10 (12th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Terveer, Elisabeth M; Vendrik, Karuna EW; Ooijevaar, Rogier E; van Lingen, Emilie; Boeije‐Koppenol, Eline; van Nood, Els; Goorhuis, Abraham; Bauer, Martijn P; van Beurden, Yvette H; Dijkgraaf, Marcel GW; Mulder, Chris JJ; Vandenbroucke‐Grauls, Christina MJE; Seegers, Jos FML; van Prehn, Joffrey; Verspaget, Hein W; Kuijper, Ed J; Keller, Josbert J
• Is Part Of: United European Gastroenterology journal. Volume 8:Issue 10(2020)
• Page Start: 1236
• Page End: 1247
• Publication Date: 2020-01-12
• Subjects: Faecal microbiota transplantation -- Clostridioides difficile -- stool bank -- donor -- cure rate -- microbiome -- microbiota modifying therapy; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.33005
• DOI: 10.1177/2050640620957765
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2050-6406

Abstract

Abstract : Background: The Netherlands Donor Feces Bank provides standardized ready‐to‐use donor faecal suspensions for faecal microbiota transplantation treatment of patients with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Objective: The purpose of this study was evaluation of safety, feasibility and outcome of faecal microbiota transplantation facilitated by a national stool bank. Methods: The methods used included: observational cohort study of donors and recipients of faecal suspensions; assessment of donor screening and patient selection performed by an expert panel of medical microbiologists, gastroenterologists and infectious disease specialists; and patient outcome evaluated at different timepoints after faecal microbiota transplantation. Results: Of 871 volunteers who registered as a potential faeces donor, 16 (2%) became active donors. Nine donors stopped or were excluded after a mean donation period of 5.7 months. In 2016–2019, 47 (27%) of 176 requests for faecal microbiota transplantations were deemed not indicated by the expert panel. In total, 129 patients with recurrent C. difficile infection were treated with 143 faecal suspensions in 40 different hospitals. The cure rate at two months after a single infusion was 89% (107/120). Of 84 patients, long‐term follow‐up (median 42 weeks) was available and sustained cure was achieved in 61 (73%). Early C. difficile infection relapses (within two months after faecal microbiota transplantation) and late recurrences (after more than two months) occurred more frequently in patients who received non‐ C. difficile antibiotics within three weeks after faecal microbiota transplantation and in moderately to severely immunocompromised patients. Of 21 patients with C. difficile infection after faecal microbiota transplantation, 14 were cured with anti‐ C. difficile antibiotics and seven with a second transplantation. No faecal microbiota transplantation‐related serious adverse events were observed, but gastro‐intestinal complaints (nausea, abdominal pain or diarrhoea) persisted in 32% of the treated patients at long‐term follow‐up. Conclusion: Faecal suspensions provided by a centralized stool bank, supported by a multidisciplinary expert team, resulted in effective, appropriate and safe application of faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent C. difficile infection. Level of evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study